2020
DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00193-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the “extent to which an instrument assesses a construct of concern and is associated with evidence that measures other constructs in that domain and measures specific real‐world criteria.” 4,13 The CsV of GaziESAS v.2.0 was determined by convergent validity (CgV), which was done by performing a Spearman correlation analysis of the GaziESAS v2.0 symptom and Tr‐PEESS v2.0 frequency domains (correlation coefficient, r = 0.81–1.0 excellent, 0.61–0.80 very good, 0.41–0.60 good, 0.21–0.40 fair, and 0–0.20 poor) 7 . The good‐to‐excellent correlation ( r = 0.4–1.0) shows evidence of CgV 14,15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the “extent to which an instrument assesses a construct of concern and is associated with evidence that measures other constructs in that domain and measures specific real‐world criteria.” 4,13 The CsV of GaziESAS v.2.0 was determined by convergent validity (CgV), which was done by performing a Spearman correlation analysis of the GaziESAS v2.0 symptom and Tr‐PEESS v2.0 frequency domains (correlation coefficient, r = 0.81–1.0 excellent, 0.61–0.80 very good, 0.41–0.60 good, 0.21–0.40 fair, and 0–0.20 poor) 7 . The good‐to‐excellent correlation ( r = 0.4–1.0) shows evidence of CgV 14,15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appearance domain (SAQ) and Self-image domain (SRS-22r) Moderate to strong negative ( r = − 0.39 to− 0.67) [ 6 9 ] Strong negative ( r = − 0.55) a Yes 2. Expectations domain (SAQ) and Self-image domain (SRS-22r) Moderate to strong negative ( r = − 0.30 to− 0.60) [ 6 9 ] Strong negative ( r = − 0.53) a Yes 3. Total score (SAQ) and Total score (SRS-22r) Moderate to strong negative ( r = − 0.30 to− 0.56) [ 7 9 ] Moderate negative ( r = − 0.48) a Yes Weak to moderate negative correlation between: 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After evaluating the measurement properties, Carreon et al[ 5 ] recommended refining their version of the SAQ to a 14-item questionnaire based on two domains (appearance and expectations) with less burden for the AIS patient. This two-domain version has been translated and cross-cultural adapted into multiple versions of the SAQ and their measurement properties were evaluated [ 5 9 ]. Since no validated Dutch version of the SAQ exists, this study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the recommended short English version of the SAQ into Dutch and to evaluate its measurement properties in AIS patients in The Netherlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows the results of validity and reliability of the original English 59) , Polish 60) , French-Canadian 61) , simplified Chinese 62) , traditional Chinese 63) , Korean 64) , Danish 65) , and Turkish 66) versions of the SAQ.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%