2021
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1899700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Fugl-Meyer assessment for the lower extremities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 33-item FMA-UE (3-point ordinal scale; score range: 0–66 points) and the 17-item FMA-LE (2-point ordinal scale; score range, 0–34 points) have been widely used to assess the severity of upper or lower limb paralysis, respectively 29 , 30 . A higher score indicated a lower level of impairment in the paralyzed upper or lower limb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 33-item FMA-UE (3-point ordinal scale; score range: 0–66 points) and the 17-item FMA-LE (2-point ordinal scale; score range, 0–34 points) have been widely used to assess the severity of upper or lower limb paralysis, respectively 29 , 30 . A higher score indicated a lower level of impairment in the paralyzed upper or lower limb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the lower extremities (FMA-LE) is another alternative reliable spasticity evaluation scale based on 5 parameters (sensory and motor functions, pain, balance, and range of motion). 9 Other potential alternative measures of spasticity include the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS88) and Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM), which reliably assesses the impact of spasticity along daily life activities and social functions from the patient's perspective. 2,7 The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) provide alternative measures to assess spasticity impact from the patient's perspective.…”
Section: Therapeutic Advances In Neurological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above evaluation methods have been widely used in clinical practice for a long time, and their reliability and validity are also widely recognized. However, the actual application is easily influenced by personal experience [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Therefore, there is great interest in developing an automated system to achieve intelligent, objective and quantitative assessment of hand function rehabilitation after stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%