2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00888.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of indices of hand-grip strength and endurance

Abstract: Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that pre- and post-fatigue maximal contraction may be utilised for the assessment of client ability and progression due to their established validity and test-retest reliability. However, previously proposed measures of fatigue such as endurance (duration of sustained contraction), Strength Decrement Index and work performed (function of endurance and force of contraction) are unreliable and invalid and may have limited use in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide range of methodologies has been employed, but the validity and reliability of these measurements have been little discussed. Measurements commonly employed include the ability to sustain sub maximal loads, between 20 and 80% of maximum strength, for the longest time possible, as well as strength deterioration indices measured before and after consecutive contractions (Jones, Robertson, & Figoni, 2009;Reuter et al, 2011;Wallström & Nordenskiöld, 2001). In the present work, the slope of the regression curve was used to represent the deterioration in the force produced during a single measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of methodologies has been employed, but the validity and reliability of these measurements have been little discussed. Measurements commonly employed include the ability to sustain sub maximal loads, between 20 and 80% of maximum strength, for the longest time possible, as well as strength deterioration indices measured before and after consecutive contractions (Jones, Robertson, & Figoni, 2009;Reuter et al, 2011;Wallström & Nordenskiöld, 2001). In the present work, the slope of the regression curve was used to represent the deterioration in the force produced during a single measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for measuring hand strength is the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer, recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) (Fernandes & Marins, 2011;Moreira, Godoy, & Junior, 2001). On the other hand, electronic instruments provide larger amounts of data through time with greater precision, and efforts have been made to combine different sources of information during measurements of muscular endurance (Oliveira, 2011;Reuter, Massy-Westropp, & Evans, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum grip strength for each hand was measured three times with a hand-held dynamometer (Jamar) as described previously (Reuter et al, 2011). The examiner verbally guided the participant through grip strength test and operation of the associated equipment.…”
Section: Grip Strength Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this face-to-face assessment, the examiner was physically present to supervise the testing session and actively led the participant through all functional tests in line with recommended guidelines (Holland et al, 2014;Podsiadlo & Richardson, 1991;Reuter et al, 2011). The same walking aids and footwear were used for both telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments.…”
Section: Face-to-face Assessment Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation