2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples

Abstract: Previous studies have suggested the cross-cultural generalizability of a 5-factor structure for personality traits. In this article, we analyzed the utility of 2 versions (100-item and 50-item) of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in both heterosexual (N = 633) and homosexual (N = 437) samples in China. Factor analysis within versions showed that both versions of these IPIP measures showed clear 5-factor orthogonal structures that were nearly identical to the American structure in both subject samples. The reli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A Slovak version of the scale (Hullová, Duriš, 2016) was used in the study. Again, the reliability of the questionnaire has been documented by foreign authors (Zheng et al, 2008) and in our data (Cronbach's α for all factors > 0.7).…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A Slovak version of the scale (Hullová, Duriš, 2016) was used in the study. Again, the reliability of the questionnaire has been documented by foreign authors (Zheng et al, 2008) and in our data (Cronbach's α for all factors > 0.7).…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The IPIP (Goldberg et al, 2006) is a large set of personality items that can be used to assess a wide variety of traits and models, including the Big Five and Five Factor Model, but which are free to use and have no restrictions regarding modifications. A number of IPIP-based scales have been created to assess the Big Five and FFM, and preliminary evidence suggests that these scales manifest reasonable convergent and discriminant validity (Gow, Whiteman, Pattie, and Deary, 2004;Zheng et al, 2008), and manifest expected relations with substance use (Raynor and Levine, 2009;Walton and Roberts, 2004).…”
Section: Neo-five Factor Inventory (Neo-ffi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent cross-cultural study also showed the instrument had acceptable reliability and factor structure across 56 nations in 10 world regions [23] . The BFI-44 has been used in a wide range of studies including education, language use, and clinical research [24][25][26][27] , and also as a criterion variable for validating the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in a study conducted in China [28] . But none of these studies reported the factor structure of the BFI-44 in their samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%