2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of monomers from orthodontic adhesives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding BPA, current results match with those of Bationo, Jordana, Boileau, and Colat‐Parros (2016) who detected BPA from Blugloo and not from Transbond XT after 24 hours of immersion in Milli‐Q water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding BPA, current results match with those of Bationo, Jordana, Boileau, and Colat‐Parros (2016) who detected BPA from Blugloo and not from Transbond XT after 24 hours of immersion in Milli‐Q water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, regarding the cytotoxic/genotoxic potential of a product, not only the manufacturer's list of chemical composition must be taken into account but also the residues derived from the synthesis of the raw materials, which may affect the biocompatibility of the product in a negative manner. Therefore, all chemicals with a potential to exert endocrine activity, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and allergic reactions should be listed in the product safety profile [53][54][55][56]. In orthodontic treatment, a major exposition to monomers occurs during the application of brackets at the beginning of multiband therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the achieved sensitivities meet the requirements for the assessment of these contaminants in the fruit drinks, with maximum permitted concentrations as defined by the European Union Commission and Codex Alimentarius. Interestingly, the developed HPLC-UV/FL method exhibited significantly lower LOD values for OTA (0.5 ng mL −1 ) and BPA (1.0 ng mL −1 ) compared to other reported methods using CE-PDA (OTA, 11.2 ng mL −1 ; BPA, 55 µg L −1 ) [31,32], and GC-MS (BPA, 20 µg L −1 ) [33], although the LOD values were comparable to those obtained using HPLC-MS/MS (OTA, 0.5 ng mL −1 ; BPA, 0.15 ng mL −1 ) [34,35].…”
Section: Limits Of Detection and Quantitationmentioning
confidence: 73%