Relationships of work-related psychosocial risks, stress, individual factors and burnout – Questionnaire survey among emergency physicians and nurses

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial risks represent a great challenge for safety and health protection at work in Europe. The purpose of this study has been to determine the relationships of psychosocial risks arising from work, stress, personal characteristics and burnout among physicians and nurses in the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). Material and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire survey which contained the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) and Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Results: A total of 88 physicians and 80 nurses completed the survey. Physicians demonstrated higher emotional (mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD) = 74.57±16.85) and cognitive (M±SD = 75.95±13.74) demands as compared to nurses. Both groups had high sensory demands and responsibilities at work, in spite of the low degree of their autonomy. The meaning of work, commitment to the workplace, and insecurity at work were high for both groups. Among all participants, stressful behavior and reactions were within the limits of low values (< 40) and coping strategies showed high values (> 60). Personal and patient-related burnout was high for both groups, where physicians were significantly affected by work-related burnout. The influence at work, degree of freedom at work, social support, sense of coherence, mental health, and problem-focused coping are negatively related to work-related burnout. Conclusions: Based on personal factors and coping styles, emergency physicians and nurses are representing a self-selective professional group that meets high work demands, great responsibility, strong commitment and insecurity at work. Burnout of physicians and nurses in the EMS tends to be ignored, although it has severe consequences on their mental and general health. Med Pr 2017;68(2):167-178

Discriminating low‐, medium‐ and high‐burnout nurses: Role of organisational and patient‐related factors

“…The problem with many of these studies is that they have remained on the exploratory, correlational level. Even at this stage of understanding, we see descriptive and associative research being repeated in recent studies (García‐Sierra, Fernández‐Castro, & Martínez‐Zaragoza, ; Giorgi et al, ; Ilic, Arandjelović, Jovanović, & Nešić, ; Pradas‐Hernández et al, ; Rezaei, Karami Matin, Hajizadeh, Soroush, & Nouri, ; Shoorideh, Ashktorab, Yaghmaei, & Alavi Majd, ; Zou et al, ). As Munhall () pointed out, nursing theories should also follow the four levels of inquiry, and when relation‐searching research has accumulated enough evidence about the concepts studied, it is time to focus scientific attention on situation‐relating (predictive) or situation‐producing (prescriptive) study designs.…”

Burnout syndrome: are stroke neurologists at a higher risk?

“…This finding suggests that the causes of burnout syndrome are much more complex than a simple equation comparing financial income and workload. Other factors such as perceived greater responsibilities, greater demands and job insecurity 30 are likely to play a major role as underlying causes of burnout syndrome. Preventive measures to relieve doctor-patient pressures include individual counseling, motivational meetings, available leisure time, career planning, self-acceptance, among others and, therefore, should be implemented.…”

Sense of Coherence in Nurses: A Systematic Review

“…Nurses are in the front line in the psychologically demanding everyday-care of patients, which can often undermine their emotional balance, influencing both their physical and mental wellbeing [1]. Moreover formal caregivers are frequently burdened with an excessive workload, high working pressure and demands, spending more time at work than on other dimensions of their lives [2,3]. All together these factors may contribute to the creation of a stressful working environment, which requires great coping abilities.…”