Relationships between progeny residual feed intake and dam productivity traits

Abstract

. 2007. Relationships between progeny residual feed intake and dam productivity traits. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 489-502. Two hundred and twenty-two yearling calves and their dams were used to examine the phenotypic (r p ) relationships between progeny residual feed intake (RFI) and maternal productivity across 10 production cycles. Progeny RFI ranged from -3.95 to +2.72 kg as fed d -1 (SD = 0.94), while RFI adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFI adj ), ranged from -2.48 to +1.53 kg as fed d -1 (SD = 0.88). Progeny RFI and RFI adj were unrelated to on-test age, body weight, growth rate, and ultrasound longissimus thoracis area and positively related to feed intake (r p = 0.51 to 0.53; P < 0.001), feed to gain ratio (r p = 0.44 to 0.46; P < 0.001), feeding behaviour traits (r p = 0.29 to 0.36; P < 0.001) and cow RFI (r p = 0.30, P < 0.05). Progeny RFI was positively related to measures of body fat (r p = 0.21 to 0.27; P < 0.05), but these relationships disappeared when RFI was adjusted for off-test backfat thickness. Cows that had produced LOW (≤ 0.5 SD), MEDIUM (± 0.5 SD) or HIGH (≥ 0.5 SD) RFI adj progeny were similar in pregnancy (95.6 vs. 95.3 vs. 96.0%, P = 0.90), calving (84.9 vs. 83.4 vs. 86.3%, P = 0.62) and weaning (81.5 vs. 80.2 vs. 82.3%, P = 0.79) rates. However, cows that produced HIGH RFI adj progeny had a higher twinning rate (3.77 vs. 0.35 vs. 0.00%, P < 0.001) and an increased calf death loss (8.06 vs. 4.24 vs. 4.02%, P = 0.10) compared with cows that produced MEDIUM or LOW RFI adj progeny. Cow body weight over 10 production cycles was similar at weaning, pre-calving and pre-breeding for dams that had produced LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH RFI adj progeny, and dams that produced LOW RFI adj progeny consistently averaged 2-3 mm more back fat thickness than dams that produced HIGH RFI adj progeny. Calf birth weight, pre-weaning ADG and 200-d weight, and cow production efficiency and calving interval were similar among dams that produced LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH RFI adj progeny. In addition, dams that produced LOW RFI adj progeny consumed less feed during their second trimester of pregnancy (10.9 vs. 11.6 vs. 12.2 kg DM d -1 , P < 0.05), had lower RFI values (-0.05 vs. 0.44 vs. 1.88 kg as fed d -1 , P = 0.018) and calved later in the year (96 vs. 90 vs. 91 d Julian, P < 0.001) than dams that produced MEDI-UM and HIGH RFI adj progeny. These results showed that efficient RFI progeny and dams consumed less feed, had improved feed to gain ratio and spent less time in feed activity than inefficient cows and calves. In addition, cows that produced efficient calves were fatter, had fewer twins, less calf death loss and produced the same weight of calf weaned per cow exposed to breeding compared with cows that produced inefficient progeny. However, cows that produced efficient or low RFI progeny calved 5-6 d later in the year than cows that produced inefficient or high RFI progeny, indicating a need to monitor reproductive fitness in low RFI replacement heifers and breeding bulls. . La RFI et la RFI adj de la progén...

Visceral organ weights, digestion and carcass characteristics of beef bulls differing in residual feed intake offered a high concentrate diet

“…These findings agree with those of Gomes et al (2012) for carcass backfat in steers. However, Nkrumah et al (2004) and Basarab et al (2007) found that RFI had a significant positive correlation (r = 0.25, 0.22; respectively) with carcass fat grade. The contrasting results for carcass fatness traits may arise from different measures of classifying carcass fatness.…”

Proteome differences associated with fat accumulation in bovine subcutaneous adipose tissues

“…The details of feeding and management were followed, as outlined by Basarab et al [38]. The steers were raised following the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal care.…”

Quantifying the relative contribution of ante- and post-mortem factors to the variability in beef texture

“…Steer calves were allocated to production systems and implant groups based on breed-cross, birth date and calf weight. The production systems were described in detail by Basarab et al (2007 and2011). Briefly, calf-fed steers were placed into a feedlot pen fitted with eight GrowSafe R feeding stations (GrowSafe R System Inc., Airdrie, Alberta, Canada) where they were fed twice daily ad libitum and adjusted from a high forage-based diet to a high grain finishing diet over 27 to 42 days.…”