2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Contact Pressure and Motion Artifacts in ECG Measurement with Electrostatic Flocked Electrodes Fabricated on Textile

Abstract: To develop a wearable multi-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measuring system, we fabricated the electrodes and wires by using electrostatic flocking technology on a textile. By using this technology, it was possible to fabricate many electrodes and wires, simultaneously. Also the flocked electrodes and wires had stretchability and washing resistance properties. To use dry electrodes, it is important to reduce the influence of motion artifacts (MAs). The results of the experiment with the skin phantom revealed tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Covering epidermal electrodes resulted in higher averaged signal-to-motion ratios across days and averaged Signal Quality Index across days during baseline leg extension, sit-to-stand, and post leg extension, indicating that the covered epidermal electrodes could record higher fidelity signals during limited dynamic lower limb movements. These results are consistent with previous studies, which showed that appropriate contact pressure between the skin and the electrode could improve signal quality in general [35][36][37]. Wrapping self-adhesive tape over the epidermal electrodes and thigh provided some pressure that was sufficient to help reduce motion artifact caused by the relative movement of the electrode with respect to the underlying skin during limited dynamic lower limb movements but was not effective enough during whole body dynamic movements where there were more motion artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Covering epidermal electrodes resulted in higher averaged signal-to-motion ratios across days and averaged Signal Quality Index across days during baseline leg extension, sit-to-stand, and post leg extension, indicating that the covered epidermal electrodes could record higher fidelity signals during limited dynamic lower limb movements. These results are consistent with previous studies, which showed that appropriate contact pressure between the skin and the electrode could improve signal quality in general [35][36][37]. Wrapping self-adhesive tape over the epidermal electrodes and thigh provided some pressure that was sufficient to help reduce motion artifact caused by the relative movement of the electrode with respect to the underlying skin during limited dynamic lower limb movements but was not effective enough during whole body dynamic movements where there were more motion artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As such, e-textiles present a unique opportunity for unobtrusive integration of different sensing modalities in multiple locations on the body. In recent years, numerous studies have looked into the effects of electrode position, size, and skin contact pressure (holding pressure) on signal quality [21][22][23]. In addition, other factors such as electrode to skin sensorial comfort, integration or construction techniques, and laundering/reusability need to be considered in the design, development and selection of textile electrodes for long-term ECG monitoring [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, electronic textiles (e-textiles) have attracted significant research attention with respect to the development of new biological information monitoring systems [1][2][3][4][5][6], human interface systems [7,8], and fashions [9,10], among other schemes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. At present, only conductive tracks and pads and several types of sensors can be formed on a textile by weaving, knitting, and stitching of conductive yarns on the textile [9,[19][20][21], or by printing of conductive inks on the textiles [3,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%