1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between bone mineralization and aluminium in the healthy infant

Abstract: Objective: This prospective study was designed to assess the relationship between variations of serum Aluminium levels and bone mineralization, which is one of its target tissues, in healthy premature (PT) and fullterm (FT) infants. Study design: Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) studied by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were compared to serum aluminium (S-Al), Ca (S-Ca), P (S-P), osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase activity (S-AP), and 25 OH Vitamin D (25 OH D) by simple and multiple r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is the case that the present levels of aluminium in infant formulas have not been shown to cause adverse effects in healthy infants it is also the case that there have not been any clinical studies which refute such as a possibility. Previous research has highlighted the potential toxicity of aluminium in infants with confounding disorders (including, prematurity, poor renal function and gastrointestinal disease) and fed infant formulas [10-13] and these studies when viewed alongside aluminium's known connections with medicine and human disease [22] should at least deter complacency concerning this issue. It is widely accepted that the not fully developed physiologies of infant's gastrointestinal tract, kidneys and blood-brain barrier may predispose them to aluminium toxicity [10,11,16,23,24] and while there are no definitive links between aluminium exposure through infant formulas and immediate or delayed toxicity in healthy infants this neither should not nor does not preclude such as a possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it is the case that the present levels of aluminium in infant formulas have not been shown to cause adverse effects in healthy infants it is also the case that there have not been any clinical studies which refute such as a possibility. Previous research has highlighted the potential toxicity of aluminium in infants with confounding disorders (including, prematurity, poor renal function and gastrointestinal disease) and fed infant formulas [10-13] and these studies when viewed alongside aluminium's known connections with medicine and human disease [22] should at least deter complacency concerning this issue. It is widely accepted that the not fully developed physiologies of infant's gastrointestinal tract, kidneys and blood-brain barrier may predispose them to aluminium toxicity [10,11,16,23,24] and while there are no definitive links between aluminium exposure through infant formulas and immediate or delayed toxicity in healthy infants this neither should not nor does not preclude such as a possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a long and significant history documenting the contamination of infant formulas by aluminium [3-9] and consequent health effects in children [10-13]. Through these and other publications manufacturers of infant formulas have been made fully aware of the potentially compounded issue of both the contamination by aluminium and the heightened vulnerability, from the point of view of a newborn's developing physiology, of infants fed such formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For infants, Cranney et al. () reported on the inconsistent results of two RCTs with vitamin D 2 supplementation examining serum 25(OH)D concentrations and BMC (Greer et al., ; Greer and Marshall, ), and on the inconsistent results of three case–control studies (Bougle et al., ; Namgung et al., ; Park et al., ) examining serum 25(OH)D concentrations and BMD and/or BMC . Chung et al.…”
Section: Appendix B – Summary Of the Evidence Considered By The Iom Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An observational study in term infants found 25(OH)D levels were positively correlated with whole‐body BMC, 387 although two case–control studies in infants found 25(OH)D was not related to lumbar spine BMC and BMD 388 , 389 . Two small RCTs of vitamin D supplements (400 IU [10 µg] per day) in breastfed infants found no difference in radial BMC between groups at 6 months 390 , 391 …”
Section: The Role Of Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%