2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between initial implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact percentage: an in vitro model study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are certainly limitations to the study as related to sample size, the results do provide direct evidence to support the notion that there is a correlation between ISQ values and BIC for an osseointegrated implant. The findings of that study are supported by numerous human cadaver studies (Nkenke et al 2003;Gedrange et al 2005), in vitro studies (Huang et al 2013), and animal (Meredith et al 1997;Park et al 2011) studies, which also reported a direct correlation between ISQ and BIC. However, others have found no correlation (Meredith et al 1997;Akca et al 2006;Ito et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…While there are certainly limitations to the study as related to sample size, the results do provide direct evidence to support the notion that there is a correlation between ISQ values and BIC for an osseointegrated implant. The findings of that study are supported by numerous human cadaver studies (Nkenke et al 2003;Gedrange et al 2005), in vitro studies (Huang et al 2013), and animal (Meredith et al 1997;Park et al 2011) studies, which also reported a direct correlation between ISQ and BIC. However, others have found no correlation (Meredith et al 1997;Akca et al 2006;Ito et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…() found in artificial bone studies (Huang et al. ) that the initial implant stability as measured by RFA was strongly positively correlated with the 3‐dimensional 3D BIC% assessed by high‐resolution microcomputed tomography. Taking into account that this correlation was not found using the 2D BIC%, the authors stated that 3D BIC% should be more representative than the 2D BIC%, as only one or a few histological sections from 2D BIC, cannot represent the entire 3D BIC between the implant and bone (Ito et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is because in some studies, the initial stability of implants, which is crucial to the osseointegration ability, was not assessed (Huang et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 High BIC% values are considered to be a prerequisite for implant stability, which is essential to successful implant treatment. 60,61 In an experimental study in dogs, Sivolella and colleagues placed the same sand-blasted acid-etched implant used in this work in dog's mandible, and measured the BIC% after 3 months of healing. 62 They found that the implants were osseointegrated in mature bone presenting a BIC% of 46.1%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%