2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982008000300010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relação lisina digestível: proteína bruta em dietas para frangos de corte no período de 1 a 21 dias de idade. Desempenho e metabolismo

Abstract: e efeito quadrático sobre a EMAn (15,5 e 18,5% de PB) e o coeficiente de retenção de N (15,5% de PB). Considerando os resultados de ganho de peso, a relação ideal de lisina digestível:proteína bruta na fase inicial foi de 6,8% (18,5% de PB) e 5,9% (21,5% de PB) ou 1,26 e 1,27% de lisina digestível. Os teores de PB das rações para frangos de corte na fase inicial podem ser reduzidos para 18,5%, sem afetar o desempenho das aves, mas reduzindo a excreção de nitrogênio em 24%, desde que as rações sejam suplementad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carcass yield results found in this trial are in agreement with findings of several other authors, as they also did not find any influence of reducing crude protein levels of the diet on these parameters, when followed by amino acid or exogenous enzyme supplementation (Kamram et al, 2008;Rodrigues et al, 2008;Vasconcellos et al, 2010). Yuan et al (2017) reported an increase in the gene expression of pancreas enzymes when a protease supplement was added to the diet for broilers.…”
Section: Protease Supplementation Under Amino Acid Reduction In Dietssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carcass yield results found in this trial are in agreement with findings of several other authors, as they also did not find any influence of reducing crude protein levels of the diet on these parameters, when followed by amino acid or exogenous enzyme supplementation (Kamram et al, 2008;Rodrigues et al, 2008;Vasconcellos et al, 2010). Yuan et al (2017) reported an increase in the gene expression of pancreas enzymes when a protease supplement was added to the diet for broilers.…”
Section: Protease Supplementation Under Amino Acid Reduction In Dietssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, when there is an unbalance of a certain digestible amino acid, namely lysine, there are deamination and transamination reactions with donation and/or degradation of its respective amino groups, moving the amino acid function to other functions such as excretion of its metabolism products (Dalólio et al 2016). Rodrigues et al (2008) claim that the digestible lysine:crude protein ratio in the diet is very important and should be maintained around 5.90% until 42 days. In the present study this ratio was 5.77% and 5.31% in the Rostagno et al (2005) and Cobb-Vantress Guidelines (2008), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De maneira semelhante, Gomide et al (2007) concluíram que o nível de PB da dieta pode ser reduzido para 16% sem que haja prejuízo sobre as variáveis de desempenho, desde que a dieta inicial seja de acordo com as recomendações da literatura; porém diferentemente do presente trabalho essas dietas foram suplementadas com fitase. Rodrigues et al (2008a) verificaram que aves alimentadas com dietas contendo 17% de PB e relação lisina digestível:proteína bruta de 5,9% apresentam desempenho semelhante à dieta controle. Da mesma forma, Costa et al (2001) Leeson & Summers (2005), aves que recebem dietas deficientes nutricionalmente tendem a aumentar o consumo de ração para suprir as deficiências dietéticas.…”
Section: Resultados E Discussão Desempenho De Frangos De Corte De 21 unclassified
“…The broilers can be kept in batches separated by sex or mixed, for each batch there are different specifications for handling. Generally, mixed-batch experiments are performed according to the recommended specifications, but the statistical analyzes are done as if there was no mixing of the sexes, since the models used do not take into account the variability between the sexes, see for example Kalmendal et al (2011), Korver et al (2004, Rodrigues et al (2008), Teixeira et al (2007) and Qureshi (1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%