2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement of epithelial sealing around titanium dental implants by chimeric peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, scholars have focused on improving epithelial biological sealing around implants and HD formation by coating titanium surfaces with LM332 or LM332-derived peptides. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 However, exogenous LM332, as a macromolecular protein, can cause immune rejection in the body and rapid protein degradation. Furthermore, protein synthesis can be expensive and suboptimal for clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, scholars have focused on improving epithelial biological sealing around implants and HD formation by coating titanium surfaces with LM332 or LM332-derived peptides. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 However, exogenous LM332, as a macromolecular protein, can cause immune rejection in the body and rapid protein degradation. Furthermore, protein synthesis can be expensive and suboptimal for clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel GSGGG spacer showed enhanced antimicrobial activity compared to the classic spacer we used here [ 57 , 58 ]. Other work has compared a rigid spacer [(EAAAK) 4 ] against a flexible spacer [(GGGGS) 4 ]; the flexible spacer design showed more effective eukaryotic cell signaling but less effective antimicrobial activity [ 36 , 59 ]. Others have shown that flexibility per se is not the requisite design criteria but rather matching hydrophobicity/philicity of surrounding residues leads to maximal eukaryotic response [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other biomedical devices suffer a similar fate [ 32 ]; implantable auditory assist devices demonstrate a 26% failure rate [ 33 ] and infections occur in up to 77% of individuals with bone-anchored orthopaedic devices [ 34 ]. We have selected the peptide LamLG3 identified [ 35 ] from a globular module (LG3) of laminin332 (LM332) capable of inducing hemidesmosome (HD) formation from oral keratinocytes in the soft tissue surrounding dental implants [ 5 , 36 , 37 ]. HDs are a transmembrane “link” or “rivet” between teeth and gingiva ( Figure 1 ), as the gingiva forms a protective, physical barrier for the tooth, or dental implant, against biofilm invasion [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G domain located at the C-terminal end of the α3 chain contains five repeating LG domains (LG1-5), among which, LG1-3 interacts with the α3β1, α6β1, and α6β4 integrins, while LG4 and LG5 combine with syndecan-1 and -4 (Rousselle et al, 2019). Liu et al (2019) successfully used Ti modification with chimeric peptideschimeric peptides (derived from the LG3 domain of the α3 chain of laminin332) to improve epithelial sealing on Ti surfaces with the potential to prevent perimucositis and peri-implantitis. In the study, the G domain of α3 chain of laminin332 was selected as the functional section, which plays an important role in the formation of HDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%