2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional transport, source apportionment and health impact of PM10 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Singapore's atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated the effects of oral arsenic exposure on health [2,3]. In recent years, many cities in China have been exposed to a continuous haze that directly affects human health and travel safety [4,5]. The main pollutant present in this haze is fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), and analysis of the composition of PM 2.5 identified that arsenic is one of the major pollutants [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the effects of oral arsenic exposure on health [2,3]. In recent years, many cities in China have been exposed to a continuous haze that directly affects human health and travel safety [4,5]. The main pollutant present in this haze is fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), and analysis of the composition of PM 2.5 identified that arsenic is one of the major pollutants [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSI reflects the most abundant pollutant found in the atmosphere during a haze episode which is PM 10 , and much of PM 10 comprises PM 2.5 . 35,48 The concentration of PM 10 is also consistently low with little variations in the absence of haze, but increased significantly during episodes of transboundary haze; 49 consequently, the results of this study largely reflected the effect of PM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Cancer risk from PAHs exposure can be calculated by the inhalation cancer risk (ICR) [32]. The values in this study was 1.0×10 -4 , indicated high potential health risk [43][44]. It implied that, 10 of 100,000 people may be at risk of developing cancer if they exposed to these pollutants for 70 years.…”
Section: ) Health Risk Assessment Of Pahsmentioning
confidence: 72%