2001
DOI: 10.5194/hess-5-59-2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional-scale hydrological modelling using multiple-parameter landscape zones and a quasi-distributed water balance model

Abstract: Regional-scale catchments are characterised typically by natural variability in climatic and land-surface features. This paper addresses the important question regarding the appropriate level of spatial disaggregation necessary to guarantee a hydrologically sound consideration of this variability. Using a simple hydrologic model along with physical catchment data, the problem is reconsidered as a model parameter identification problem. With this manner of thinking the subjective nature as to what to include in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, the spatially-distributed parameterisation obtained by a multisite calibration leads to a better model fit than the singlesite calibration, treating model parameters as spatially invariant. Wooldridge and Kalma (2001) draw a similar conclusion for the comparison of a lumped and a semidistributed parameterisation of the conceptual VIC model structure: the semi-distributed parameterisation results in a better model performance. In general, for large-scale applications of a hydrological model, insight into the spatial variation in parameter optima can improve the performance of a model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In their study, the spatially-distributed parameterisation obtained by a multisite calibration leads to a better model fit than the singlesite calibration, treating model parameters as spatially invariant. Wooldridge and Kalma (2001) draw a similar conclusion for the comparison of a lumped and a semidistributed parameterisation of the conceptual VIC model structure: the semi-distributed parameterisation results in a better model performance. In general, for large-scale applications of a hydrological model, insight into the spatial variation in parameter optima can improve the performance of a model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In most cases, the discretization of the landscape is done with regard to similarity of vertical hydrological processes, i.e. hydrotopes being similar in terms of infiltration, percolation and evapotranspiration fluxes (Kite and Kouwen, 1992;Krysanova et al, 1998;Becker and Braun, 1999;Gurtz et al, 1999;Wooldridge and Kalma, 2001). This is usually achieved by intersecting physiographic data such as elevation, soils, vegetation and land use.…”
Section: Model Representation Of Landscape Variability and Lateral Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, they lie in the selection of those landscape characteristics, heterogeneities and related hydrological processes that ensure that the assumption of similarity of the hydrological response within one of the accordingly delineated modelling units is valid. This selection can be based on expert knowledge, the perception of the hydrological behaviour of the study area and on comparative studies, which evaluate the performance of models for different ways of delineating the hydrotopes (Becker and Braun, 1999;Wooldridge and Kalma, 2001). In most cases, the discretization of the landscape is done with regard to similarity of vertical hydrological processes, i.e.…”
Section: Model Representation Of Landscape Variability and Lateral Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of depth to groundwater is related to atmospheric and surface conditions, such as precipitation, temperature, soil adoption, vegetation water content, soil humidity and evaporation (Liang et al, 1994;Mitchell & DeWalle, 1998;Wooldridge & Kalma, 2001). Groundwater fluctuation analysis estimated the variations in stored water, renewable storage water quantity, and the investment of groundwater (Lioyd, 1999).…”
Section: Vegetation and Groundwater Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%