Representation of landscape variability and lateral redistribution processes for large-scale hydrological modelling in semi-arid areas

Abstract

The spatial variability of landscape features such as topography, soils and vegetation defines the spatial pattern of hydrological state variables like soil moisture. Spatial variability thereby controls the functional behaviour of the landscape in terms of its runoff response. A consequence of spatial variability is that exchange processes between landscape patches can occur at various spatial scales ranging from the plot to the basin scale. In semi-arid areas, the lateral redistribution of surface runoff between adjacent landscape patches is an important process. For applications to large river basins of 10 4 -10 5 km 2 in size, a multi-scale landscape discretization scheme is presented in this paper. The landscape is sub-divided into modelling units within a hierarchy of spatial scale levels. By delineating areas characterized by a typical toposequence, organised and random variability of landscape characteristics is captured in the model. Using runoff -runon relationships with transition frequencies based on areal fractions of modelling units, lateral surface and subsurface water fluxes between modelling units at the hillslope scale are represented. Thus, the new approach allows for a manageable description of interactions between fine-scale landscape features for inclusion in coarse-scale models. Model applications for the State of Ceará (150,000 km 2 ) in the north-east of Brazil demonstrate the importance of taking into account landscape variability and interactions between landscape patches in a semiarid environment. Using mean landscape characteristics leads to a considerable underestimation of infiltration-excess surface runoff and total simulated runoff. Re-infiltration of surface runoff and lateral redistribution processes between landscape patches cause a reduction of runoff volumes at the basin scale and contribute to the amplification of variations in runoff volumes relative to variations in rainfall volumes for semi-arid areas. q 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Attribution of streamflow trends in snow and glacier melt‐dominated catchments of the Tarim River, Central Asia

“…Simulation-Based Analysis 3.5.1. WASA Hydrological Model The hydrological model WASA (Model of Water Availability in Semi-Arid Environments) [G€ untner, 2002;G€ untner and Bronstert, 2004] is a semidistributed model with conceptual and process-orientated approaches. The model has been adapted for applications in mountain regions with previous applications in Central Asia .…”

“…The model has been adapted for applications in mountain regions with previous applications in Central Asia . The original spatial discretization based on hillslopes [G€ untner and Bronstert, 2004;Francke et al, 2008] was modified into an approach based on hydrological response units (HRUs) as it allows faster computations. The model has routines for snow versus rain differentiation, snow and glacier melt, glacier mass balance, interception, evapotranspiration, infiltration and saturation excess runoff, interflow, and groundwater runoff.…”

Water Balance Modeling in a Semi-Arid Environment with Limited in situ Data Using Remote Sensing in Lake Manyara, East African Rift, Tanzania

“…However, the advent of satellite derived hydro-meteorological measurements and increased stress on water resources has triggered more interest in such research [1,3]. The hydrological dynamics of a semi-arid catchment basin as expressed by both direct and base flow is affected by a number of factors including the spatial variation of topography, soils, vegetation, land use, river topography, structural geology and the spatial temporal variation of climate [4]. In many semi-arid regions of the world surface reservoirs provide the major source of water [2].…”

An experiment to gauge an ungauged catchment: rapid data assessment and eco-hydrological modelling in a data-scarce rural catchment

“…The functional soil map is the result of a RS classification of the same Landsat 7 data; the five functional soil classes and three sub-classes as in Table 1. (Hundecha and Bárdossy 2004), (b) mechanistic representation of the major functionality in the water cycle (Tietjen et al 2009), (c) data-driven look-up table referencing (Güntner and Bronstert 2004), and (d) optimality-based approaches (Lei et al 2008, Schymanski 2008. Jackson et al (2009) underpin the strong link between hydrology and ecology and point out that in agricultural systems this link is very simplified and degrees of freedom are reduced.…”