Regional power South Africa: Co-operative hegemony constrained by historical legacy

Abstract

This article argues that regional powers can be distinguished by four pivotal criteria: claim to leadership, power resources, employment of foreign policy instruments, and acceptance of leadership. Applying these criteria to the South African case, the crucial significance of institutional foreign policy instruments for the power over policy outcomes at the regional and global level is demonstrated. But although Pretoria is ready to pay the costs of co-operative hegemony (capacity building for regional institutions and peacekeeping for instance), the regional acceptance of South African leadership is constrained by its historical legacy. Additionally Pretoria's foreign policy is based on ideational resources such as its reputation as an advocate of democracy and human rights and its paradigmatic behaviour as a 'good global citizen' with the according legitimacy. The Mbeki presidency was more successful in converting these resources into discursive instruments of interest-assertion in global, than in regional bargains. In effect the regional power's reformist south-oriented multilateralism is challenging some of the guiding principles of the current international system.

Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power

“…Last, English school advocates have also made the case to examine international society at the regional level (Buzan, 2012). As a result, a rich and growing literature has been applied to understand the many complexities of contrasting regional orders, including Europe (Kirchner and Sperling, 2007), Asia (Beeson, 2009;Zhang, 2011), the Middle East (Buzan and Gonzalez-Pelaez, 2009) and Africa (Flemes, 2009). …”

Emerging donors: the promise and limits of bilateral and multilateral democracy promotion

“…South Africa's foreign policy is constrained by its historical legacy and driven by regional development imperatives (Flemes 2009a;Habib 2009). Its foreign policy is also shaped by its soft power, which lies in its democratic characteristics.…”

South Africa's Iran policy: ‘Poster child’ meets renegade

“…Partially subscribing to a similar view, Flemes argued that South Africa's regional leadership is seen (in part) in the region as selfish. 99 Realists would further argue that foreign policy is not only composed of material factors; ideational factors influence it as well. 100 The ideational sources of South African foreign policy stem from the ideology of the ANC, perceived as 'the custodian and steward of South Africa's foreign policy'; 101 the party has indeed left a heavy ideological imprint on South African foreign policy.…”