1976
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(76)90310-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in the response to nicotine in isolated canine arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the responses of isolated strips of cerebral blood vessels to nicotine vary according to species of animals: relaxation in dogs [18,19], contraction in humans [15] and no response in cattle [15]. The present experiments show that nicotine has dual actions on dog cerebral arteries and that there is a difference in the response of the basilar and middle cerebral arteries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…It has been reported that the responses of isolated strips of cerebral blood vessels to nicotine vary according to species of animals: relaxation in dogs [18,19], contraction in humans [15] and no response in cattle [15]. The present experiments show that nicotine has dual actions on dog cerebral arteries and that there is a difference in the response of the basilar and middle cerebral arteries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Previous attempts to stimulate such nerves in isolated coronary arteries have generally been unsuccessful (Nishioka, 1971;Toda, 1975); however, more recently it has been reported that adrenergic responses can be elicited in the isolated left descending coronary artery of the dog when stimulating electrodes are placed close to the aortic root (Borda, Schuchleib & Henry, 1977). (Furchgott, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From studies on isolated cerebral arteries of the dog in response to nicotine (Toda, 1975;1976a) and on cat, dog and sheep cerebral arteries in response to transmural electrical stimulation (Lee, Su & Bevan, 1975; Duckles, 1979), a non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic mechanism of relaxation induced by nerve stimulation has been postulated. Such a relaxation was not observed in cerebral arteries isolated from monkeys (Duckles, Lee & Bevan, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%