2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive index of biological tissues: Review, measurement techniques, and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are close to the refractive index of water because the mass of the phantoms is mostly made up of water. More importantly, the experimental results are in close accordance with human skin refractive indices found in scienti c literature, ranging from 1.34 to 1.56 (Khan et al, 2021) .…”
Section: Group Refractive Indexsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are close to the refractive index of water because the mass of the phantoms is mostly made up of water. More importantly, the experimental results are in close accordance with human skin refractive indices found in scienti c literature, ranging from 1.34 to 1.56 (Khan et al, 2021) .…”
Section: Group Refractive Indexsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Yang et al have shown that tissue samples with oral squamous cell carcinoma, a type of cancerous lesion, has a lower extinction coe cient compared to that of normal tissue (Yang et al, 2020) . The increased cell density in cancerous tissue meanwhile increases the overall refractive index of the lesion (Khan et al, 2021) . Thus, by studying the cross-sectional image together with the extinction coe cients and the refractive indices, we can improve the accuracy of disease diagnosis.…”
Section: Working Principles Of Td-octmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner sphere wall was then coated with BaSO 4 by Gigahertz-Optik, Germany. For the evaluation of the biological samples, we used the scattering phase function postulated by Henyey and Greenstein [16] with an asymmetry factor of g = 0.9 and a refractive index of 1.4 surrounded by water, given by Kedenburg et al [17], and glass (five layers), except for muscle, brain and adipose tissue, for which 1.4 [18] and 1.46 [19] surrounded by glass (three layers, i.e., it is assumed that there are no water layers) were applied, respectively, see Table 1 and Section 2.2.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Evaluation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the refractive index of the tissue layer we used n = 1.4. Varying sample refractive indices in the range of 1.3 to 1.5, which seems to be realistic in biological media [18], results in typical relative changes of the determined effective scattering and absorption coefficients of ∆µ s < 5% and ∆µ a < 13%, respectively, according to Monte Carlo simulations. In the case of adipose tissue, muscle and brain matter, the sodium chloride solution was repressed by the soft tissue.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the THz range, direct RI measurement of biological tissues and OCAs for a wide spectral range is possible [15,16], in the ultraviolet-near infrared (UV-NIR) range such methodology is not possible, and dispersion calculations must be made from discrete measurements [4,[17][18][19]. There are some distinct methods to measure the RI of biological samples at discrete wavelengths, such as the ones based on interferometer or ellipsometer setups [20], but the most commonly used nowadays are the ones that use multiwavelength refractometers [18] or the total internal reflection setup to be used with various lasers at different wavelengths [21]. Other techniques to measure the RI of biological tissues and the importance of these measurements for optical diagnosis have also been recently described [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%