2016
DOI: 10.3390/app6050153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Liquid Bridge Force for 3D Microstructure Measurements

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed an increased demand for a method for precise measurement of the microstructures of mechanical microparts, microelectromechanical systems, micromolds, optical devices, microholes, etc. This paper presents a measurement system for three-dimensional (3D) microstructures that use an optical fiber probe. This probe consists of a stylus shaft with a diameter of 2.5 µm and a glass ball with a diameter of 5 µm attached to the stylus tip. In this study, the measurement system, placed in a va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Force between the charged stylus tip and the measured surface is called electrostatic force [22]. When the charged stylus is brought close to the charged surface to be measured and the distance between the stylus tip and the measured surface becomes 10 µm or below while using the stylus shaft and tips with diameters of 20 and 35 µm, the stylus tip is attracted to the measured surface by the electrostatic force and may stick to it [21]. The adsorption distance decreases as the diameter of the stylus shaft increases.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Force between the charged stylus tip and the measured surface is called electrostatic force [22]. When the charged stylus is brought close to the charged surface to be measured and the distance between the stylus tip and the measured surface becomes 10 µm or below while using the stylus shaft and tips with diameters of 20 and 35 µm, the stylus tip is attracted to the measured surface by the electrostatic force and may stick to it [21]. The adsorption distance decreases as the diameter of the stylus shaft increases.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when measuring 3-dimensional shapes such as free-form surfaces, there is a problem that errors occur depending on the contact direction. Therefore, we have developed a system which enables measurements to be taken in a vacuum vessel, reducing the effects of adhesion due to surface forces by about 60% [21]. However, the size of the space inside the vacuum vessel is limited, making it impossible to measure large objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface forces become increasingly more prominent than gravity when the size of the microprobe tip is less than a few millimeters. Surface forces are several orders of magnitude greater than gravity at scales of several tens to several hundred micrometers in diameter [31][32][33][34]. Therefore, surface forces attract the probe tip to the surface when the probe tip is close to the measurement surface [35].…”
Section: Issues For Microprobe Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, surface forces attract the probe tip to the surface when the probe tip is close to the measurement surface [35]. Although surface forces can be reduced via chemical treatment, surface texture, and environmental control [32,33], it is difficult to ignore the effect of these surface forces in micro-CMM probes. Surface forces significantly degrade measurement repeatability and reproducibility.…”
Section: Issues For Microprobe Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial adhesive force caused by the resultant force and the contact At nanoscale, the interaction between the stylus microsphere tip and the sample surface is a complex process. Different interfacial forces, such as capillary, van der Waals, electrostatic, interfacial friction, and hydrogen bonding forces, influence the interaction [29]. In our previous study [30], we established a simple mass-spring contact mechanical model between the microsphere of the probe and the sample surface in three directions, and the microforces mentioned were only analyzed qualitatively and schematically.…”
Section: Mechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%