1986
DOI: 10.1021/jf00069a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in levels of deoxynivalenol in contaminated wheat by chemical and physical treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility for the reduction of DON is the chemical treatment of cereals before feeding as already investigated in the 1980s. In a study by Young et al (1986), it was shown that the treatment of contaminated cereals with sodium bisulfite (SBS) is most effective in reducing the DON concentrations: less than 2% of the initial concentration of DON was detected after treatment of DON-contaminated wheat with SBS. During SBS-treatment, DON reacts with SBS in a 1,4-Michael addition yielding DON-sulfonate (DONS) (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility for the reduction of DON is the chemical treatment of cereals before feeding as already investigated in the 1980s. In a study by Young et al (1986), it was shown that the treatment of contaminated cereals with sodium bisulfite (SBS) is most effective in reducing the DON concentrations: less than 2% of the initial concentration of DON was detected after treatment of DON-contaminated wheat with SBS. During SBS-treatment, DON reacts with SBS in a 1,4-Michael addition yielding DON-sulfonate (DONS) (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is suitable that detoxification methods are developed for the inactivation of toxins produced during the pre‐harvest stages of crop production. Although physical and chemical detoxification methods have been reported (Young et al. 1986; Trenholm et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain harvesting and post harvest strategies such as modifying combine harvester settings and the use of screening, cleaning, and aspiration techniques to removal shriveled, light-weight, and small-sized kernels have also been recommended as ways of further reducing losses due to FHB and DON (16,22,24,39,52). Grain harvesting and post harvest strategies such as modifying combine harvester settings and the use of screening, cleaning, and aspiration techniques to removal shriveled, light-weight, and small-sized kernels have also been recommended as ways of further reducing losses due to FHB and DON (16,22,24,39,52).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%