Transducers ’01 Eurosensors XV 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59497-7_361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Effect of Parasitic Capacitance on MEMS Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact allows the removal of the effect of parasitic feedthrough, which separates the parasitic and motional current in the frequency domain as has been demonstrated [4]. The approach proposed in this letter is based on the subtraction of the parasitic currents [2] provided by two MEMS resonators with the same physical dimensions taking advantage of the monolithical integration with an on-chip CMOS differential amplifier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact allows the removal of the effect of parasitic feedthrough, which separates the parasitic and motional current in the frequency domain as has been demonstrated [4]. The approach proposed in this letter is based on the subtraction of the parasitic currents [2] provided by two MEMS resonators with the same physical dimensions taking advantage of the monolithical integration with an on-chip CMOS differential amplifier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, some efforts have been reported to reduce the parasitic current caused by the parasitic capacitance that generates not only degradation of the measured electric quality factor of the MEMS (Q) but also a shift in the resonance frequency. Two main approaches have been proposed to overcome this problem: a) implementation of differential sensing using two identical MEMS resonators [2] and b) use of the MEMS as a mixer due to its quadratic dependence on the applied voltage [3]. In this mixing approach, the excitation/actuation of the MEMS is done by two AC signals, neither of which is at the resonance frequency of the resonator, but their sum or difference corresponds to the MEMS resonant frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we employed data post-processing technique to extract the motional signal. 18,19 Toward this, we first measure the S 21 signal using the network analyzer and save the data into the memory while keeping the DC bias to zero. In this case, the data only contain the parasitic feedthrough signal.…”
Section: A a Binary Comparatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both signals are sinusoidal, their superposition gives a characteristic different from that of a single resonator ( figure 11, plot a). To separate the motional resonator response from the parasitic coupling signal, we have adapted the method described in [7]. Using the set-up shown in figure 10, we first measure the resonator response with V b = 0, i.e.…”
Section: Test Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%