Redesign and reuse in compositional knowledge-based systems

Brazier, Frances M. T.; Langen, Pieter H. G. van; Treur, Jan; Wijngaards, Niek J. E.

doi:10.1016/0950-7051(95)01026-2

Cited by 12 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other CBR applications included flight condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for aircraft engine (Vingerhoeds et al, 1995). In knowledge-based approach for task implementation, many approaches have been reported for knowledge engineering in design task (Johnson et al, 1988;Schreiber et al, 1994;Brazier et al, 1996). In these research and developments, multilayered modeling approaches and the object-oriented methods are commonly used to construct knowledge, design process, and product structure.…”

Section: Plan and Development For Problem-oriented Model In Troubleshmentioning

confidence: 97%

The troubleshooting task implementation in automotive chassis using virtual interactive technique and knowledge-based approach

Liang¹

2008

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Plan and Development For Problem-oriented Model In Troubleshmentioning

confidence: 97%

The troubleshooting task implementation in automotive chassis using virtual interactive technique and knowledge-based approach

Liang¹

2008

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…So far several theories of ID have been presented, including [4], [9], and [16]. These developments share a common consensus of design, shown by Figure 1, where transformation occurs from a function space to an attribute space via a meta-model space where the steps or processes of design are performed [16].…”

Section: Intelligent Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several design researchers choose to formalize their process representation with logic [4], [15], however such knowledge is not restricted to this type.…”

Section: Stage 3: Knowledge Representationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A framework for classifying intelligent design theories

Preston

Mehandjiev

2004

Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Workshop on Interdisciplinary Software Engineering Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software Engineering (SE) design approaches are traditionally based on concepts associated with the procedural and objectoriented SE paradigms, such as stepwise methods and techniques for abstraction, modularity and refinement of software functionality. In contrast, researchers in other engineering domains have developed theories of Intelligent Design (ID) to explain what human design engineers think and do in the design process.So far these theories have provided useful process models, knowledge representations and strategies to underpin a number of approaches to designing complex artifacts. Our aim is to explore the potential of such engineering-based ID theories to support SE design. In pursuit of this we need to appraise existing ID theories in a systematic manner. Due to the large number of ID theories and the diversity of elements which they are composed of, the first stage of any systematic appraisal would be to develop a framework for classifying and analyzing ID theories. Such a framework is proposed in this paper. It can be used to categorize and assess ID theories, their elements and research methodologies. Together with a set of appraisal criteria, we can then assess the usefulness of each ID theory for supporting SE design activities. The framework identifies the main elements of ID theories including the underlying research approach, the process models created, and the knowledge representations derived. This paper provides a full description of the framework and shows how it can be used to analyze an example ID theory.

show abstract

“…Similar to Gero's (1990) model, synthesis and evaluation can both be modelled as subcomponents of DOD-modification. Brazier, van Langen, Treur and Wijngaards (1995c) show how synthesis by case-based reasoning can be modelled as a decomposition of the GTMD. Takeda, Veerkamp, Tomiyama and Yoshikawa (1990) have developed a cognitive design model, constructed from unit design cycles of which each consists of five subtasks:…”

Section: Task (De)compositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation

Brazier

Eck

Treur

1997

Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An elevator configuration task, the VT task, is modelled within DESIRE as a design task. DESIRE is a framework within which complex reasoning tasks are modelled as compositional architectures. Compositional architectures are based on a task decomposition, acquired during task analysis. An earlier developed generic task model of design, based on a logical analysis and synthesis of task models devised for diverse applications, has been refined for the elevator configuration task. The resulting task model includes a description of the ontology of the elevator domain and a description of the task model.

show abstract

Redesign and reuse in compositional knowledge-based systems

Cited by 12 publications

References 8 publications

The troubleshooting task implementation in automotive chassis using virtual interactive technique and knowledge-based approach

The troubleshooting task implementation in automotive chassis using virtual interactive technique and knowledge-based approach

A framework for classifying intelligent design theories

Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About