2019
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.040860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of Device-Related Thrombus After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Hence, in the absence of cost and benefit analysis, as well as guidelines to support simultaneous closure of LAA and ASD, our group has decided to close only patients with dilated atriums and established chronic atrial fibrillation as there was concern about increasing the risk for procedure-related complications. 22,24,25 In these patients, we opined that LAA closure can be performed even though patients do not have contraindications for oral anticoagulants. Our study offers the prospect of a novel indication for LAA closure in patients who are suitable candidates for transcatheter ASD closure with chronic atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 Hence, in the absence of cost and benefit analysis, as well as guidelines to support simultaneous closure of LAA and ASD, our group has decided to close only patients with dilated atriums and established chronic atrial fibrillation as there was concern about increasing the risk for procedure-related complications. 22,24,25 In these patients, we opined that LAA closure can be performed even though patients do not have contraindications for oral anticoagulants. Our study offers the prospect of a novel indication for LAA closure in patients who are suitable candidates for transcatheter ASD closure with chronic atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nyboe et al in their review of 1168 adult patients with ASDs found that over a median follow‐up period of 9.6 years (range: 1‐33 years), patients without prevalent atrial fibrillation had a 10‐year cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation of 11% (95% CI 9‐14%) after closure compared with 2% (95% CI 1.8‐2.5%) 23 . Hence, in the absence of cost and benefit analysis, as well as guidelines to support simultaneous closure of LAA and ASD, our group has decided to close only patients with dilated atriums and established chronic atrial fibrillation as there was concern about increasing the risk for procedure‐related complications 22,24,25 . In these patients, we opined that LAA closure can be performed even though patients do not have contraindications for oral anticoagulants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with paroxysmal or newly onset atrial fibrillation may be treated via transcatheter ablation. Indiscriminately closing the LAA during ASD closure increases procedural cost and may even increase the patient's risk for procedure-related complications [17][18] . We, therefore opined that such a simultaneous approach should be patient-specific rather than universal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although thrombus resolution was achieved in most patients with short-term OAC, approximately 50% of patients who stopped OAC had a recurrent DRT. 22 Furthermore, data on the predictors of DRT are heterogenous and are hindered by the small number of events. 23,24 At present, it remains unknown whether DRT is mostly related to patient factors (eg, ventricular function, duration of NVAF, etc), procedural factors (eg, peridevice leak or deep implantation), or to the type and duration of adjunctive antithrombotic therapy, or to a combination of these factors.…”
Section: Device-related Thrombusmentioning
confidence: 99%