2020
DOI: 10.1111/pace.14049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left atrial appendage and atrial septal occlusion in elderly patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation

Abstract: Background: Elderly patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) often present with chronic atrial fibrillation and large left to right shunt. This study reports the experience of left atrial appendage (LAA) and ASD closure in patients with significant ASD and chronic atrial fibrillation. Methods: We report six consecutive elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and significant ASD who underwent LAA and fenestrated ASD closure from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2019. All periprocedural and long-term… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively speaking, percutaneous closure is rarely adopted because of the difficulty of vascular dilatation; the guide wire and sheath cannot be vertical defect plane, resulting in the increase of parachute replacement rate, closure difficulty, and the probability of failure; (5) for the ASD with defect diameter > 35 mm and good defect edge condition, the transthoracic approach with short operation path and good occluder release angle is generally chosen. Even so, the difficulty of occlusion and the possibility of failure of occlusion are significantly higher than those of ASD patients with defect diameter ≤ 35 mm, and it is very likely that the occluder is attached or clamped unfirmly because the defect diameter is too large, resulting in the loss of the occluder after operation [ 35 ]. Our research results are consistent with the above conclusions, which shows that this study has good value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively speaking, percutaneous closure is rarely adopted because of the difficulty of vascular dilatation; the guide wire and sheath cannot be vertical defect plane, resulting in the increase of parachute replacement rate, closure difficulty, and the probability of failure; (5) for the ASD with defect diameter > 35 mm and good defect edge condition, the transthoracic approach with short operation path and good occluder release angle is generally chosen. Even so, the difficulty of occlusion and the possibility of failure of occlusion are significantly higher than those of ASD patients with defect diameter ≤ 35 mm, and it is very likely that the occluder is attached or clamped unfirmly because the defect diameter is too large, resulting in the loss of the occluder after operation [ 35 ]. Our research results are consistent with the above conclusions, which shows that this study has good value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%