2020
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recording brain activities in unshielded Earth’s field with optically pumped atomic magnetometers

Abstract: Understanding the relationship between brain activity and specific mental function is important for medical diagnosis of brain symptoms, such as epilepsy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG), which uses an array of high-sensitivity magnetometers to record magnetic field signals generated from neural currents occurring naturally in the brain, is a noninvasive method for locating the brain activities. The MEG is normally performed in a magnetically shielded room. Here, we introduce an unshielded MEG system based on opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the above approach of detecting the interference, we show that it is relatively simple and intuitive to observe the interference effect in practical applications. This is because the practical magnetic fields, for example, biomagnetic fields [17,38,39] and NMR fields generated by organic compounds, [35][36][37] naturally have components along different axes to the magnetometers. As a typical example, we demonstrate the interference in NMR signals recorded with atomic magnetoemeters and shall see the interference effect interprets NMR asymmetric spectra, that is, large differences of the amplitudes of resonant lines, which are greatly distorted from the conventional NMR prediction [21,22,35] and have never been well understood before.…”
Section: Interference Effect In Atomic Magnetometermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the above approach of detecting the interference, we show that it is relatively simple and intuitive to observe the interference effect in practical applications. This is because the practical magnetic fields, for example, biomagnetic fields [17,38,39] and NMR fields generated by organic compounds, [35][36][37] naturally have components along different axes to the magnetometers. As a typical example, we demonstrate the interference in NMR signals recorded with atomic magnetoemeters and shall see the interference effect interprets NMR asymmetric spectra, that is, large differences of the amplitudes of resonant lines, which are greatly distorted from the conventional NMR prediction [21,22,35] and have never been well understood before.…”
Section: Interference Effect In Atomic Magnetometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising application is using arrays of high-sensitivity atomic magnetometers to monitor the faint magnetic-field signals from human brain activities. [17,38,39] The weak brain magnetic field (on the order of 100 fT) generated by neural currents spatially distributes around the magnetic sensor and its components along different directions probably interface with each other when recorded with atomic magnetometers, resulting in the systematic error of the actual brain field amplitudes. If such interference occurs and without the prior knowledge of interference in magnetometers, it would reduce the accuracy in locating the brain electrophysiological symptom.…”
Section: Nmr Interference Asymmetric Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For these experiments, regardless of the usage of comagnetometer, which is for suppressing the magnetic-field noise, an environment with lower magnetic-field noise is beneficial for further reducing the systematic errors related to magnetic-field variations. Furthermore, a magnetic-field noise level of about tens of fT/Hz and a wide range of operational magnetic field covering Earth’s magnetic field is attractive for ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance [ 52 , 53 ] and for recording bio-magnetic signals from human brain activities [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%