2018
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of Major Dehiscence After Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Abstract: Repair of complete bilateral cleft lip with protruding premaxilla is challenging, and postoperative dehiscence was common. Re-repair is usually suggested for the dehisced lip, but other methods might be needed in unique situations. Evaluation was performed to check the presence of prolabial skin, wound scarring, and the position of premaxilla. Reconstruction plan was made to restore the anatomical components as possible and to repair under minimal tension. Two patients with major dehiscence were reported. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant surgical complications. The repaired lip did not dehisce, 28 the scars were considered acceptable, 29 there were no premaxillary or vomerine fractures, and the premaxillary segment remained vital and without vascular compromise. 30 Other potential complications related to surgical palatal repair in persons with BCCLP were avoided: necrosis, infection, and fistulas in palatal repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There were no significant surgical complications. The repaired lip did not dehisce, 28 the scars were considered acceptable, 29 there were no premaxillary or vomerine fractures, and the premaxillary segment remained vital and without vascular compromise. 30 Other potential complications related to surgical palatal repair in persons with BCCLP were avoided: necrosis, infection, and fistulas in palatal repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We do not consider surgical adhesion or premaxillary setback in the primary reconstruction. When the tissue tension was significantly high in the presence of premaxillary protrusion, the postoperative dehiscence of the lip repair was reported from 24% to 45% with other complications (Deleyiannis, 2009; Narayanan and Adenwalla, 2013; Lim et al, 2018). Based on our experience, the intraoperative RPM is a reliable and useful adjunct procedure, as there was no dehiscence or other complications in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early intervention during the first year of life, including lip adhesion (Innis, 1961; Bishara and Olin, 1972; Seibert, 1983; Millard and Latham, 1990; Berkowitz et al, 2004; Nemes et al, 2013), nasoalveolar molding (Grayson and Cutting, 2001; Lee et al, 2008; Garfinkle et al, 2011; Grayson and Garfinkle, 2014; Broder et al, 2016; Maillard et al, 2017), or even surgical premaxillary setback (Cronin, 1957; Niranjane et al, 2014) has been described as the treatment of protruding premaxilla. However, these procedures are not always successful (Maillard et al, 2017) and there are possible complications such as dehiscence (Lim et al, 2018), heavy scars on the lip tissue (Bardach and Salyer, 1991, Witt and Hardesty, 1993; Winters and Hurwitz, 1995), or unfavorable maxillary growth (Bishara and Olin, 1972; Koh et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term follow-up of this group of patients in underserved areas and providing ideal continuity of care have been challenging. In short-term follow-up, however, these patients had successful lip repair without dehiscence or any other complications (Lim et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%