Fluvial Meanders and Their Sedimentary Products in the Rock Record 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119424437.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of a sandy point‐bar deposit: implications for fluvial facies analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea is consistent with recent observations of a modern point-bar deposit along a highly mobile unvegetated river meander in the Toiyabe Basin, NV (Ielpi & Lapôtre, 2019b), which is dominated by sand-sized materials with little intercalated mud. If found to be representative of other unvegetated meandering streams, the observed stratigraphy in the Toiyabe Basin is inconsistent with heterolithic lateral accretion sets being diagnostic of river meandering (as also suggested by, e.g., Hartley et al, 2018;McMahon & Davies, 2018b;Swan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Earth Surfacementioning
confidence: 85%
“…This idea is consistent with recent observations of a modern point-bar deposit along a highly mobile unvegetated river meander in the Toiyabe Basin, NV (Ielpi & Lapôtre, 2019b), which is dominated by sand-sized materials with little intercalated mud. If found to be representative of other unvegetated meandering streams, the observed stratigraphy in the Toiyabe Basin is inconsistent with heterolithic lateral accretion sets being diagnostic of river meandering (as also suggested by, e.g., Hartley et al, 2018;McMahon & Davies, 2018b;Swan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Earth Surfacementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Such an observation suggests that many sandy meander-belt deposits may not have been identified correctly in the fluvial rock record (e.g. Swan et al, 2019) and may also imply that amalgamated meandering sandy fluvial systems could be under-represented in pre-Devonian fluvial deposits. Our observations suggest that prevegetation meandering rivers may have been more common than previously envisaged, and the examples described here are potential analogues for prevegetation fluvial deposits (Santos and Owen, 2016).…”
Section: Implications For Rivers Developed Before Land Plant Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, floodplain deposits are fine grained, composed of horizontally bedded (or laminated) and/or massive fine sand, silt, and clay. Root traces and desiccation cracks are ubiquitous in floodplain deposits (e.g., Swan et al, 2018). Nanson and Croke (1992) and Miall (2014) suggested classifying floodplain facies into three broad classes: high-energy non-cohesive floodplain, medium-energy non-cohesive floodplain and low-energy cohesive floodplain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanson and Croke (1992) and Miall (2014) suggested classifying floodplain facies into three broad classes: high-energy non-cohesive floodplain, medium-energy non-cohesive floodplain and low-energy cohesive floodplain. The reality is much more complex, however, because in some cases, floodplain deposits may be truncated by laterally migrating channel bars, resulting in stacked bar deposits and bedload sheets defined as multistory (Alexander, 1992;Gibling, 2006;Miall, 2014) or stacked deposits (Swan et al, 2018). In the East Asian monsoon area, the seasonal climate variation (warm and wet in summer, cold and dry in winter with aeolian activity) may result in specific changes in discharge and sediment and thus related fluvial process and sedimentary facies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%