1986
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1986.13533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable architectures for VLSI processing arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also developed efficient algorithms for reconfiguration in a neighborhood reconfiguration model (see also [CF90,SS86]). In this model, the neighborhood reconfiguration consists of an n x k rectangular array with one column of spare PEs on one side.…”
Section: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also developed efficient algorithms for reconfiguration in a neighborhood reconfiguration model (see also [CF90,SS86]). In this model, the neighborhood reconfiguration consists of an n x k rectangular array with one column of spare PEs on one side.…”
Section: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a reconfiguration scheme where a mesh-connected highly parallel computer is divided into groups of PEs with small mesh-structures, a spare row is added to each group in the same way as in [2], these planes are successively connected upward and downward, and, finally, the top and bottom groups are connected. The scheme has such a feature that although switchings for reconfiguration are done locally, compensations are done globally, considering the distribution of faults over the whole plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4, we show how ECCs can be used to form (intersecting) processor groups, and how the deterministic and average error detectability of an ECC form lower bounds for the deterministic and average fault tolerance of the corresponding FT multiprocessor, and, in general, why they are a good choice to determine these groupings. Some previous probabilistic methods [22], [26], [28] have also used intersecting processor groups for the special case of the 2D mesh topology; their processor groups are the rows and columns of the 2D mesh, and, thus, they fortuitously happen to be based on the 2D-parity code. In Section 8, we compare our designs to some of the best of such previous designs.…”
Section: Intersecting Ft Processor Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since such designs are geared toward having a large fault tolerance on the average (over all fault patterns), but the worst-case fault tolerance may be lower, we call them probabilistic FT designs. Such probabilistic designs have also been proposed previously, though mainly for 2D mesh-connected multiprocessors [6], [22], [26], [27], [28]. In contrast, in this paper, we develop probabilistic designs that are applicable to any topology, and, for the special case of the 2D mesh, we compare our resulting designs' reconfigurabilities and hardware overheads to those of the best previous probabilistic designs [6], [27], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation