2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33326-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommender Systems: Sources of Knowledge and Evaluation Metrics

Abstract: Recommender or Recommendation Systems (RS) aim to help users dealing with information overload: finding relevant items in a vast space of resources. Research on RS has been active since the development of the first recommender system in the early 1990s, Tapestry, and some articles and books that survey algorithms and application domains have been published recently. However, these surveys have not extensively covered the different types of information used in RS (sources of knowledge), and only a few of them h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One such challenge is incorporating Human Factors in order to increase user acceptance of the systems and the items recommended. Historically, the focus on recommender systems' research has been on improving the algorithms' predictive accuracy (Parra & Sahebi, 2013), but as McNee et al (McNee, Riedl, & Konstan, 2006b) highlighted in the paper "Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems," accuracy does not always correlate with a good user experience, making the study of recommender interfaces one of the areas in need for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such challenge is incorporating Human Factors in order to increase user acceptance of the systems and the items recommended. Historically, the focus on recommender systems' research has been on improving the algorithms' predictive accuracy (Parra & Sahebi, 2013), but as McNee et al (McNee, Riedl, & Konstan, 2006b) highlighted in the paper "Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems," accuracy does not always correlate with a good user experience, making the study of recommender interfaces one of the areas in need for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG@k) is a rankingdependent metric that not only measures how many products can be correctly predicted but also takes the position of the products in the recommended list with length k into account. The nDCG metric is based on the Discounted Cummulative Gain (DCG@k) which is given by [19]:…”
Section: Evaluation Methods and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They said that the ideal scenario for them would be if the system told them, in advance, what they should be reading. In this regard, content-based recommender systems provide recommendations to users based on comparing items or products to the items in which the user has shown an interest [83], and collaborative filtering technology, as well as other forms of recommendation, automates the process of sharing opinions on the relevance and quality of information [84]. The advanced capabilities of MCC make it possible to apply machine learning algorithms to the information being generated by the feedback and evaluations, allowing the generation of suggestions and recommendations.…”
Section: (D) Lesson Evaluation (R6) and Future Recommendations (R8)mentioning
confidence: 99%