2000
DOI: 10.1067/mhl.2000.108327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of patients who require emergency assistance: A descriptive study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of published literature reports on the 'relative advantage' of nursing assessment and identification of significant abnormal physiology in ward patients. This supports the 'compatibility' of assessment with nursing (Cioffi 2000;Russell 2000;Benner et al 1999;Gibson 1997;Daffurn et al 1994;Benner 1984).…”
Section: Compatibilitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A range of published literature reports on the 'relative advantage' of nursing assessment and identification of significant abnormal physiology in ward patients. This supports the 'compatibility' of assessment with nursing (Cioffi 2000;Russell 2000;Benner et al 1999;Gibson 1997;Daffurn et al 1994;Benner 1984).…”
Section: Compatibilitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Muitos modelos assistenciais existem e a reavaliação constante se faz necessária 4,5,6,7 . Ao planejar a assistência às situações de urgência e emergência é necessário ter o conhecimento do quê, com qual gravidade e a quem se atende 8 , quanto tempo se usa para estes atendimentos e o destino dos pacientes 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Nursing experience is associated with RRT activation (Mackintosh et al 2012, Johnston et al 2015. However, nurses were less confident referring calls to medical staff when concerned about a patient as these subjective cues were difficult to communicate (Cioffi et al 2000a, McArthur-Rose 2001, NSPA 2007, required more justification and took time to collect data to place the clinical change in context (Braaten 2015). As a result delays in referral were associated with lack of self efficacy, clinical experience and uncertainty (Massey et al 2014, Roberts et al 2014) and untrained and junior staff (Pattison & Eastham 2011, Ludikhuize et al 2011, Radeschi et al 2015.…”
Section: Referral Protocols (Mechanism)mentioning
confidence: 99%