Patient survival often depends on decisions by nurses to call emergency assistance. The experiences of nurses calling emergency assistance have not been described. This descriptive study explored the experiences of registered nurses (n=32) using unstructured interviews. The main findings were that nurses questioned whether they were doing the 'right thing' calling the emergency team, sometimes collaborated with others prior to calling and most felt nervous and anxious. They recognized patient deterioration from feelings they had that something was wrong. However, they were not able 'to put their finger on it'. Knowing the patient and past experiences were involved in the recognition of deterioration. This association indicates the importance of experience in the development of clinical decision-making skills. Further, nurses calling emergency assistance need to be provided with the opportunity to debrief after calling. Their heavy reliance on subjective data before searching for objective data as outlined in the emergency calling criteria suggests that it is essential that nurses do not devalue or ignore concerns they may have about patients.
To facilitate women's self-management across these phases, support is needed that focuses on providing strategies to strengthen individual approaches by women. Such support might promote activities of daily living as a specific entity of physical activity, expose myths about activity during pregnancy, and endorse the benefits of weight management arising from physical activity, not just during pregnancy, but across the lifespan.
This paper explores intuitive judgements of nurses in clinical decision-making situations. The qualities of intuition are presented from both theoretical and practical perspectives and attitudes towards intuition from both nurses themselves and other health professionals are identified. An heuristic framework from cognitive psychology is applied to intuitive aspects of the clinical judgements that nurses have made. This interpretation is proposed as a partial explanation of intuition, and its use in advancing the understanding of intuition is recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.