2021
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal relations between relative deprivation and psychological adjustment among single-parent children in China: A longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 7-point Likert scale items of the cognitive dimension range from 1 ( very good ) to 7 ( very bad ), and the items of the emotional dimension range from 1 ( very satisfied ) to 7 ( extremely unsatisfied ); higher scores indicate higher levels of relative deprivation. This scale has been used in previous studies with good reliability and validity (Ye and Xiong, 2017 ; Xiong et al, 2020 , 2021 ). The data of this study showed that the fit indexes of the scale were good (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.92, χ 2 /degrees of freedom [ df ] = 4.49, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.067).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 7-point Likert scale items of the cognitive dimension range from 1 ( very good ) to 7 ( very bad ), and the items of the emotional dimension range from 1 ( very satisfied ) to 7 ( extremely unsatisfied ); higher scores indicate higher levels of relative deprivation. This scale has been used in previous studies with good reliability and validity (Ye and Xiong, 2017 ; Xiong et al, 2020 , 2021 ). The data of this study showed that the fit indexes of the scale were good (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.92, χ 2 /degrees of freedom [ df ] = 4.49, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.067).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale has been used in previous studies with good reliability and validity (Xiong and Liu, 2020;Xiong et al, 2021aXiong et al, , 2021bYe and Xiong, 2017). The data of this study showed that the fit indices of the scale were acceptable (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.92, χ 2 /df = 4.49, SRMR = 0.067; Schumacker and Lomax, 2010;Wen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ( never ) to 4 ( always ), with higher scores indicating higher levels of social anxiety. This scale has been used in previous studies with good reliability and validity (Guo et al, 2017; Li et al, 2020; Xiong et al, 2021a). The data of this study showed that the fit indices of the scale were good (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, χ 2 / df = 2.85, SRMR = 0.047).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, studies on the influence factors of NSSI behavior are mostly cross-sectional, ignoring the role of time, which fails to thoroughly reveal the dynamic relationship of mediating pathways over time. A longitudinal follow-up study can be conducted to comprehensively investigate the changes in the development of the relationship between variables by incorporating a time factor [ 41 ]. Recent developments in statistical methods for analyzing longitudinal data provide efficient estimates of change and predictors of change over time [ 42 ].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%