2000
DOI: 10.2174/0929867003374516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor Targeting for Tumor Localisation and Therapy with Radiopeptides

Abstract: Receptor targeting with radiolabeled peptides has become very important in nuclear oncology in the past few years. The most frequently used peptides in the clinic are analogs of somatostatin (SRIF), e.g. OctreoScan, which contain chelators for the radioisotopes 111In, 86Y, 90Y, 67Ga, 68Ga and 64Cu or for 99mTc and 188Re. and were labelled with the halogens 123I and 18F. Radiolabeled analogs of &alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (&alpha-MSH), neurotensin, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), bombesin (BN), s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
168
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
168
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The halflife is short enough to enable the administration of reasonably high doses which, in turn, allow good quality images. Moreover, 99mTc is available from 99Mo/99mTc generators in high quality and at low cost (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The halflife is short enough to enable the administration of reasonably high doses which, in turn, allow good quality images. Moreover, 99mTc is available from 99Mo/99mTc generators in high quality and at low cost (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best clinically established system for in vivo tumor targeting with radiolabeled peptides (1) is based on the somatostatin receptor, and a particularly large number of excellent radioligands have been developed for that purpose, all derived from somatostatin agonists (16). The first part of the present study deals with somatostatin receptor subtype 3 (sst 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the accumulation of radioactivity in the sst 3 -expressing tumors by using the agonist 111 In-DOTA-NOC is considerably less than by using the antagonist 111 In-DOTA-sst 3 -ODN-8 and amounts to Ϸ7%IA͞g at 4 h and decreases at 24 h ( Table 3). The calculated tumor͞tissue ratios, representing important parameters to evaluate the quality of a targeting agent (16), are considerably higher with 111 In-DOTA-sst 3 -ODN-8 than with 111 In-DOTA-NOC, especially for the tumor͞blood and tumor͞muscle ratios at 4 and 24 h. Established sst 2 -expressing organs, such as the stomach, adrenals, or pancreas, show a blockable accumulation of 111 In-DOTA-NOC (Table 3), whereas they show no significant accumulation of 111 In-DOTA-sst 3 -ODN-8 ( Table 2). As a negative control, labeling of the sst 3 -expressing tumor with a specific sst 2 agonist radioligand, 111 In-DTPA-TATE (22), is found to be negligible ( (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] However, the central question in the development of new radiopharmaceutical agents is how to deliver them specifically to the cellular targets (receptors). Many strategies have been attempted and some are currently in clinical use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%