2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-021-01288-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Technological Advancement in Surrounding Gate MOSFET for Biosensing Applications - a Synoptic Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Additionally, the outcome of temperature has also been studied on linearity and distortion FOMs. The linearity and distortion FOMs are estimated as per Equations (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) and designed in relation of gate voltage.…”
Section: Impact Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28 Additionally, the outcome of temperature has also been studied on linearity and distortion FOMs. The linearity and distortion FOMs are estimated as per Equations (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) and designed in relation of gate voltage.…”
Section: Impact Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various design engineering techniques are also performed to overcome this drawback in NWFET. [12][13][14][15] The conventional MOSFET design offers the severe drawback of abrupt source-drain junctions and high parasitic source-drain resistance. These issues can be overcome by using the Schottky barrier (SB) MOSFET in place of conventional MOSFET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FET‐based sensors typically employ metal‐oxide‐semiconductors (MOS) or organic semiconductors as channel materials, as they are cost‐effective, scalable, and have system‐on‐chip (SoC) capabilities. However, MOSFETs also have limitations such as poor signal‐to‐noise ratio, low on/off ratio, slow mobility, and a short lifetime [19–21] . To overcome these limitations, carbon nanomaterials have been proposed as alternative channel materials for FET devices due to their desirable chemical and physical properties, including: ease and breadth of chemical functionalisation strategies; (size) compatibility with biomolecules; their excellent electronic and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MOSFETs also have limitations such as poor signal‐to‐noise ratio, low on/off ratio, slow mobility, and a short lifetime. [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] To overcome these limitations, carbon nanomaterials have been proposed as alternative channel materials for FET devices due to their desirable chemical and physical properties, including: ease and breadth of chemical functionalisation strategies; (size) compatibility with biomolecules; their excellent electronic and mechanical properties. These chemical and physical characteristics of carbon nanomaterials can assist in the sensitive detection of target biomarkers with FET biosensing devices setups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%