2018
DOI: 10.1002/etep.2763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent contributions and future prospects of the modular multilevel converters: A comprehensive review

Abstract: Summary The modular multilevel converters (MMCs) are frequently preferred for medium and high power energy conversion systems thanks to their modular structure and high quality output waveform. The remarkable studies related to the MMC have been carried out in recent years, which are mainly focused on its topology, control, or application. In this paper, MMC circuit topologies consisting of traditional submodule cells and new proposed configurations are introduced, and their control process, modulation techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new MMC has many advantages compared with the conventional two-level or multilevel VSC, especially in terms of switching losses and power quality. 22 Figure 2A shows the three-phase configuration of the MMC topology. This one is comprised of N submodules (SMs) per arm (see Figure 2B) which results into a line-to-neutral voltage waveform of (N + 1) levels.…”
Section: Vsc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new MMC has many advantages compared with the conventional two-level or multilevel VSC, especially in terms of switching losses and power quality. 22 Figure 2A shows the three-phase configuration of the MMC topology. This one is comprised of N submodules (SMs) per arm (see Figure 2B) which results into a line-to-neutral voltage waveform of (N + 1) levels.…”
Section: Vsc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has limitations such as a large number of switching components, voltage‐balancing issues, and complex control schemes for high‐voltage levels. Whereas cascaded H‐bridge (CHB) is much suitable for grid‐connected and static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) applications . Due to modularity and simple control scheme, CHB stands out at the cost of individual isolated DC sources for each bridge …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas cascaded H-bridge (CHB) is much suitable for grid-connected and static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) applications. [1][2][3] Due to modularity and simple control scheme, CHB stands out at the cost of individual isolated DC sources for each bridge. 4 Further, several efforts are made in designing hybrid MLIs to generate higher levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a requirement of single-stage power conditioning (i.e., single PCU) solution for SPVWP where the inverter is capable of generating more than the two-level voltage in the output (Packiam et al, 2013;Singh, 2016, 2018). Multilevel inverters (MLIs) provide the ultimate solution for the addressed issue and capable of delivering high power and medium voltage for industrial applications (Kurtoglu et al, 2019). Moreover, MLI extracts lesser input current functions both at the higher and lower switching frequency, gives lesser dv/dt effects in the load side, and also reduces filter needs that leads to avoiding stresses in bearings of a motor (Poompavai and Vijayapriya, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%