Alternative Lithographic Technologies IV 2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.919744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REBL: design progress toward 16 nm half-pitch maskless projection electron beam lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason there has been put significant effort into the improvement of the performance of EBL tools in recent years which has led to the development of multi-beam and hybrid technologies. [2][3][4][5] Besides the technical advancements of EBL systems the resist materials used are vital for high quality and high throughput EBL. For an ideal EBL resist material it is desirable to have high sensitivity, high contrast, high resolution, and high plasma etching resistance for pattern transfer to the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason there has been put significant effort into the improvement of the performance of EBL tools in recent years which has led to the development of multi-beam and hybrid technologies. [2][3][4][5] Besides the technical advancements of EBL systems the resist materials used are vital for high quality and high throughput EBL. For an ideal EBL resist material it is desirable to have high sensitivity, high contrast, high resolution, and high plasma etching resistance for pattern transfer to the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, as resolution requirements have increased there has been increasing focus on EBL for volume production, with the development of a number of multi-beam and hybrid technologies. [8][9][10][11] Due to the low-throughput, even for multibeam EBL, the sensitivity of e-beam resists is considered a very important factor. For high voltage e-beam exposure, a 50-60 mC cm À2 resist sensitivity requirement has been set out by ITRS, whilst low voltage systems, such as MAPPER, 11 require sensitivities of 30-60 mC cm À2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as caused by lens heating. The method is applicable to multiple-patterning lithography with DUV, EUV and even electron beam projection exposures 10 , provided similar pupil illumination is used in consecutive steps and a suitable fluorophore is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%