2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rear Contact Pattern Optimization based on 3D Simulations for IBC Solar Cells with Point-like Doped Contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when efficiencies over 22% are targeted, the front surface recombination velocity needs to be below 30 cm s -1 (ref. 25). Figure 2a shows a minority carrier lifetimes of ∼1 ms in our b-Si samples, which corresponds to a surface recombination velocity S eff of ∼20 cm s -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Reflectance and Surface Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, when efficiencies over 22% are targeted, the front surface recombination velocity needs to be below 30 cm s -1 (ref. 25). Figure 2a shows a minority carrier lifetimes of ∼1 ms in our b-Si samples, which corresponds to a surface recombination velocity S eff of ∼20 cm s -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Reflectance and Surface Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can reduce recombination by reducing contact pitch. Contact pitch affects cell parameters and maintain tradeoff between recombination and resistive losses [45]. Moreover, widely spaced contacts are responsible for ohmic losses and degrade the efficiency of solar cells [46].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some advantages of this structure are evident, the absence of metal shadow losses and the facility to assemble solar cells in modules with coplanar connection. However, if one wants to exploit the full benefit of this structure, high minority-carrier bulk lifetime, outstanding front and rear surface passivation [5,6], and low front reflectance are mandatory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%