2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the collision avoidance algorithm proposed in the paper, classic AEB algorithms including Berkley, Mazda, Honda and SeungwukMoon (Fujita et al, 1995;Doi et al, 1994;Seiler et al, 1998;Moon and Yi, 2008) were also tested for comparison. All tests were implemented via the Prescan Simulation Platform (Prescan, 2018), with vehicle maximum deceleration set at 0.8 g (to account for possible unfavorable driving situations, where generally a maximum deceleration of 10 m/s 2 and 8 m/s is assumed for dry and wet roads respectively for AEB systems (Jeppsson et al, 2018)) and road friction coefficient set at 0.8, and using Prescan built-in 2D simple vehicle dynamics model and radar sensor model ("2D simple" refers to "a model that is capable of simulating a car's longitudinal, lateral and roll motion", but neglects vehicle movement in the vertical direction and assumes the front/rear two tires have the same angle and speed like a bicycle, also referred to as bicycle models (Prescan, 2018)). Finally, simulation results of each algorithm under each test scenario were obtained and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Test and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the collision avoidance algorithm proposed in the paper, classic AEB algorithms including Berkley, Mazda, Honda and SeungwukMoon (Fujita et al, 1995;Doi et al, 1994;Seiler et al, 1998;Moon and Yi, 2008) were also tested for comparison. All tests were implemented via the Prescan Simulation Platform (Prescan, 2018), with vehicle maximum deceleration set at 0.8 g (to account for possible unfavorable driving situations, where generally a maximum deceleration of 10 m/s 2 and 8 m/s is assumed for dry and wet roads respectively for AEB systems (Jeppsson et al, 2018)) and road friction coefficient set at 0.8, and using Prescan built-in 2D simple vehicle dynamics model and radar sensor model ("2D simple" refers to "a model that is capable of simulating a car's longitudinal, lateral and roll motion", but neglects vehicle movement in the vertical direction and assumes the front/rear two tires have the same angle and speed like a bicycle, also referred to as bicycle models (Prescan, 2018)). Finally, simulation results of each algorithm under each test scenario were obtained and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Test and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, vehicles undertaking deceleration level about 1g configure a frequent driving behavior in the real world, during the life cycle of the seat Jeppsson et al (2018). Consequently, fatigue life cycle analysis of the seat anchorage mechanism seems quite appropriate, because it is subjected to variable loading.…”
Section: Fatigue Life Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Status Report on Road Safety is released by World Health Organization (WHO, Geneva 27, Switzerland) 2018, in which WHO claims that about 1.35 million people die each year in road traffic accidents [ 1 , 2 ]. Similarly, American Automobile Association (AAA) Foundation released press report in 2016 that 50,658 vehicle roads accidents occurred only in America from the year 2011 to 2014 due to roadway obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%