2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21568-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: What’s Up Johnny?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [20], authors propose generic mitigations against different variants of EFail attacks, such as Reply [9,16], EFail-Md or Efail-Mg [18]. They do so by checking the decryption context, e.g., the SMTP headers and MIME structure during decryption, implementing their solution into the Thunderbird email client and OpenPGP with support for AEAD.…”
Section: Mitigations To Efail Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], authors propose generic mitigations against different variants of EFail attacks, such as Reply [9,16], EFail-Md or Efail-Mg [18]. They do so by checking the decryption context, e.g., the SMTP headers and MIME structure during decryption, implementing their solution into the Thunderbird email client and OpenPGP with support for AEAD.…”
Section: Mitigations To Efail Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only can signatures be stolen, but all SMTP headers are unauthenticated by OpenPGP. Indeed, the surreptitious forwarding attack is made even easier due to this underlying issue [14]. For example, the From: header specifies the sender and this identity should match the identity of the OpenPGP identifier of the sender in the signature, yet this is not done.…”
Section: Unauthenticated Headersmentioning
confidence: 99%