2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4770-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Os isotope dating of pyrite from the footwall mineralization zone of the Xinqiao deposit, Tongling, Anhui Province: Geochronological evidence for submarine exhalative sedimentation

Abstract: The Xinqiao deposit is located in the Tongling area, Anhui Province. This deposit is dominantly composed of stratiform sulfide orebodies, which are restricted to the transitional zone from clastic rocks to carbonates at the base of the Late Carboniferous Huanglong Formation. There are discordant veinlets or networks of mineralization in the footwall rocks below the stratiform sulfide orebodies. The underlying discordant mineralization zones coexist with conformable stratiform sulfide orebodies, which are consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Upper Permian black shale from the Laoyaling Mo orebody has been dated to 234.2 ± 7.3 Ma by the Re–Os technique, which is much earlier than the Yanshanian intrusions and younger than the Permian host rock, suggesting that the Mo ore is sedimentary in origin with later hydrothermal disturbance (Yang et al ., ). The latest Re–Os isotope dating of pyrite from the veinlets or network mineralization zone of the Xinqiao deposit reports an age of 319 ± 13 Ma (Guo et al ., ), which is consistent with the age of Carboniferous strata hosting the stratiform sulfide orebody. The Dongguashan deposit is proposed to have been formed through remobilization of Carboniferous sedimentary exhalative sulfides by a hydrothermal activity related to Yanshanian pluton based on sulfur isotopic study (Hou et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The Upper Permian black shale from the Laoyaling Mo orebody has been dated to 234.2 ± 7.3 Ma by the Re–Os technique, which is much earlier than the Yanshanian intrusions and younger than the Permian host rock, suggesting that the Mo ore is sedimentary in origin with later hydrothermal disturbance (Yang et al ., ). The latest Re–Os isotope dating of pyrite from the veinlets or network mineralization zone of the Xinqiao deposit reports an age of 319 ± 13 Ma (Guo et al ., ), which is consistent with the age of Carboniferous strata hosting the stratiform sulfide orebody. The Dongguashan deposit is proposed to have been formed through remobilization of Carboniferous sedimentary exhalative sulfides by a hydrothermal activity related to Yanshanian pluton based on sulfur isotopic study (Hou et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…). Pyrite from Cu–Au deposits (Cardon et al ., ; Xie et al ., ; Guo et al ., ) or Cu–Ag deposits (Selby et al ., ) has relatively high Re (Fig. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These deposits are predominantly hosted in Carboniferous carbonates, but show a close spatial association with Cretaceous granitoid intrusions that are genetically related to porphyryskarn ores (Mao et al 2011)and references therein). Despite many years of research, considerable debate remains on the genesis of these deposits (Guo et al 2011;Mao et al 2011;Xie et al 2014;Xiao et al 2016). Several studies advocate that the stratabound massive sulfide deposits are products of a Carboniferous sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX) system, which was overprinted by hydrothermal fluids associated with Cretaceous magmatism (Gu et al 2000;Gu et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010;Guo et al 2011;Xie et al 2014;Xiao et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many years of research, considerable debate remains on the genesis of these deposits (Guo et al 2011;Mao et al 2011;Xie et al 2014;Xiao et al 2016). Several studies advocate that the stratabound massive sulfide deposits are products of a Carboniferous sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX) system, which was overprinted by hydrothermal fluids associated with Cretaceous magmatism (Gu et al 2000;Gu et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010;Guo et al 2011;Xie et al 2014;Xiao et al 2016). In contrast, some authors considered these deposits as skarn/carbonate replacement systems genetically associated with Cretaceous magmatism (Pan and Dong 1999;Mao et al 2011;Zhang et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation