2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examining premature mortality in anorexia nervosa: A meta-analysis redux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
127
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
127
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] Based on meta-analyses, approximately 1 of 5 premature deaths in patients with AN was due to suicide 2 ; suicide-specific standardized mortality ratios were estimated to be 18.1 in AN 4 and 7.5 in BN. 3 However, studies included in the meta-analyses reported considerably varied estimates, possibly owing to differences in follow-up time, source, sample size, and representativeness of the samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Based on meta-analyses, approximately 1 of 5 premature deaths in patients with AN was due to suicide 2 ; suicide-specific standardized mortality ratios were estimated to be 18.1 in AN 4 and 7.5 in BN. 3 However, studies included in the meta-analyses reported considerably varied estimates, possibly owing to differences in follow-up time, source, sample size, and representativeness of the samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little remains known about risk of premature death due to ED in males. The surprisingly high proportion of older, male deaths on death certificates listing anorexia nervosa as an associated or underlying cause of death is incongruent with a meta-analysis observing fewer deaths in studies with a higher percentage of males [34]. Misclassification from inappropriate or inaccurate registration procedures is a likely source of bias when examining death certificates for anorexia nervosa without linkage to a well-defined clinical sample or patient register, although males may indeed comprise a significant portion of untreated cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No male data were used, in accordance with the majority of participants included in the trials. A meta-analysis by Keshaviah et al [34] re-extracted and re-analyzed source data from prior meta-analyses [32,33] utilizing a rigorous approach to avoid duplicate entries and include cohorts with zero deaths without artificially altering data through continuity corrections. As done with prior meta-analyses, standard mortality ratios were calculated using official statistics for females aged 24-34 years.…”
Section: Mortality Risk Associated With Ed In Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations