2010
DOI: 10.1045/january2010-hillmann
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RDA Vocabularies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the interest in RDA, it has been an important topic in library literature for the past several years (Coyle & Hillmann, 2007;Danskin, 2009;Gorman, 2007;Hillmann, Coyle, Phipps, & Dunsire, 2010;Oliver, 2007). Current research on RDA adoption includes articles that analyze the maturity and fit of RDA in cataloging environments (Biella & Lerner, 2011;Bloss, 2011;Cronin, 2011;Kuhagen, 2011;McCutcheon, 2011;Shieh, 2011;Wacker, Han, & Dartt, 2011;Young & Bross, 2011), articles that examine RDA in the context of older standards (Chapman, 2010), literature on the National Library RDA test process itself (Boehr et al, 2012) and publications on potential RDA encoding methods (Coyle, 2011;Wacker et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature On Rda Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the interest in RDA, it has been an important topic in library literature for the past several years (Coyle & Hillmann, 2007;Danskin, 2009;Gorman, 2007;Hillmann, Coyle, Phipps, & Dunsire, 2010;Oliver, 2007). Current research on RDA adoption includes articles that analyze the maturity and fit of RDA in cataloging environments (Biella & Lerner, 2011;Bloss, 2011;Cronin, 2011;Kuhagen, 2011;McCutcheon, 2011;Shieh, 2011;Wacker, Han, & Dartt, 2011;Young & Bross, 2011), articles that examine RDA in the context of older standards (Chapman, 2010), literature on the National Library RDA test process itself (Boehr et al, 2012) and publications on potential RDA encoding methods (Coyle, 2011;Wacker et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature On Rda Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To the best of our knowledge, such aids are lacking in the publishing domain. Converters to transform bibliographic records into linked data according to RDA vocabularies [19] and other models exist, e.g. [9] and bibtex2rdf (http://www.l3s.de/ ~siberski/bibtex2rdf/).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of OWL ontologies from conceptual models has been widely proposed for FRBR (Ciccarese & Peroni, 2011;Shotton & Peroni, 2016), RDA (Hillmann et al, 2010) and CIDOC-CRM (Reinhardt, 2009). The EGAD is developing an OWL ontology called RiC-O for implementation of RiC-CM model in order to publish archival data on the web.…”
Section: Proposal Of An Ontology For the Conceptual Archival Descriptmentioning
confidence: 99%