2015
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00184014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Razão peso/perímetro cefálico ao nascer na avaliação do crescimento fetal

Abstract: Objetivou-se utilizar a razão peso/perímetro cefálico ao nascer para avaliar o crescimento fetal. Foi realizado um estudo de coorte retrospectiva na Zona da Mata de Pernambuco, Brasil, com 915 crianças nascidas a termo. As medidas antropométricas da criança, assistência pré-natal, fumo durante a gestação, renda familiar, escolaridade e estado nutricional materno foram coletados nas primeiras 24 horas pós-parto. As crianças foram classificadas em proporcionais (razão peso/perímetro cefálico ≥ 0,90) e desproporc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Placental insufficiency leads to asymmetric FGR due to redistribution of fetal blood flow and fetal brainsparing, which can eventually lead to stillbirths, the catastrophic end result of severe placental insufficiency [ 1 ]. A lower W/HC ratio has previously been shown to indicate asymmetrical FGR, and in our study newborns in the abnormal RI group had significantly lower W/HC ratios compared to newborns in the normal RI group [ 20 , 21 ]. In terms of postnatal growth, Z-scores for weight, length, and HC in SGA babies in our cohort were significantly lower than the AGA group up to 10 weeks, but not thereafter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Placental insufficiency leads to asymmetric FGR due to redistribution of fetal blood flow and fetal brainsparing, which can eventually lead to stillbirths, the catastrophic end result of severe placental insufficiency [ 1 ]. A lower W/HC ratio has previously been shown to indicate asymmetrical FGR, and in our study newborns in the abnormal RI group had significantly lower W/HC ratios compared to newborns in the normal RI group [ 20 , 21 ]. In terms of postnatal growth, Z-scores for weight, length, and HC in SGA babies in our cohort were significantly lower than the AGA group up to 10 weeks, but not thereafter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Reconhecidamente, mulheres com alturas mais baixas tendem a gerar conceptos com comprimento igualmente baixo e provável crescimento limitado frente aos filhos de mulheres com altura normal ou alta 15,24,27 . Esta relação pode estar associada a restrições no desenvolvimento e crescimento no útero materno, além de também perpetuar o ciclo da desnutrição crônica devido à manutenção da baixa estatura através das gerações subsequentes 28 Apesar da altura materna também ser conhecida por sua relação de causa -efeito com o baixo peso ao nascer, neste estudo não foi encontrado associação do peso ao nascimento com restrições no crescimento linear das crianças 22,29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Growth charts remain the cornerstone of interpreting growth indices in childhood (62) . WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) Growth Standards are intended as a single, global growth standard by which children of all (61) References/standards: none, but lower BW:PW suggests impaired nutrient transfer across placenta (61) Cut-offs: no universal cut-offnormal BW:PW at term = 5-7 (61) Body size and proportions Birth anthropometry: -Weight -Length -Head circumference Gestational age-related -Weight-for-GA -Length-for-GA -HC-for-GA (Sex-specific) References/standards: -INTERGROWTH-21st (52,102) -Fenton 2013 (includes Olsen data) (53) Cut-offs: Weight-for-GA (1) : -< 10th percentile = SGA −10th-90th percentile = AGA -> 90th percentile = LGA Proportionality -BW/HC ratio -Difference between BW and HC z-score -W/L ratio (GA-and sex-specific) -Ponderal index (GA-specific) -BMI (BMI; GA-and sex-specific) References/standards: -INTERGROWTH-21st: W/L ratio-for-GA (103) -Olsen 2015: BMI-for-GA (57) -Landmann 2006: ponderal index-for-GA (56) Cut-offs: -BW/HC ratio < 90 (proposed, unvalidated) (58) -HCZ-BWZ > 1 (proposed, unvalidated) (59) -PI < 2 or < 10th percentile for GA (13,55) Body composition Body volume (by air-displacement plethysmography)…”
Section: Antenatal Period: Foetal Growth Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%