2012
DOI: 10.1002/bewi.201201550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Mechanics in the Eighteenth Century. On Structural Developments of a Mathematical Science

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: Rationale Mechanik im 18. Jahrhundert. Zur strukturellen Entwicklung einer mathematischen Wissenschaft. Die Rolle der Mathematik in den Wissenschaften sowie in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts kann kaum hoch genug veranschlagt werden. In neueren wissenschaftsphilosophischen Darstellungen wird diese Rolle jedoch häufig in einer anachronistischen Weise beschrieben und analysiert, indem jüngere Auffassungen über formale Mathematik einerseits und empirische Wissenschaft anderersei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But contrary to Jacobi's idea that it only includes pure mathematics, and that mechanics does not correspond to that field because it should be applicable to the empirical realm (cf. Pulte 2012), Reech thought that mechanics should be grounded as a mathematical science (Reech 1852, 33). In fact, to him, statics should be established prior to dynamics, as a science of equilibrium, whose assertions grounded on a true basis would have “the same status of certainty as the truths of geometry” (ibid., 41).…”
Section: Convention In Mechanics: Jacobi Reech and Poincarémentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But contrary to Jacobi's idea that it only includes pure mathematics, and that mechanics does not correspond to that field because it should be applicable to the empirical realm (cf. Pulte 2012), Reech thought that mechanics should be grounded as a mathematical science (Reech 1852, 33). In fact, to him, statics should be established prior to dynamics, as a science of equilibrium, whose assertions grounded on a true basis would have “the same status of certainty as the truths of geometry” (ibid., 41).…”
Section: Convention In Mechanics: Jacobi Reech and Poincarémentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 This is what Pulte has explained as the end of the “euclidianist” conception of mechanics (cf. Pulte 2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually Newton's method can be thought as based first on models (Ducheyne, ) backed up by the introduction of “a set of ingeniously chosen mathematical principles which function as axioms for the deductive structure of the Principia . In fact, asserted truth is ‘injected’ into rational mechanics not from the bottom, but from the top, and its flow down to the level of phenomena cannot be turned round by conflicting observations” (Pulte, , p. 189). See also, for example, Garrison (), Kleiner () and Shapiro ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%