2006
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratings Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the channels is relevant since it influences inter alia the viewer awareness of the programmes provided. Programmes broadcast on small channels have not the same chance to reach big audiences as programmes on big channels independent from content (Eastman and Ferguson, 2012; Webster et al, 2005). This is why we created a sample in which the share of programmes broadcast on big channels (>10% market share) is nearly equal among the different editorial concepts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the channels is relevant since it influences inter alia the viewer awareness of the programmes provided. Programmes broadcast on small channels have not the same chance to reach big audiences as programmes on big channels independent from content (Eastman and Ferguson, 2012; Webster et al, 2005). This is why we created a sample in which the share of programmes broadcast on big channels (>10% market share) is nearly equal among the different editorial concepts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explanation of the presence or absence of science programmes must also include the popularity of these programmes in European societies. This is especially relevant for the TV market that is driven by various audience measuring tools, the most important of which are daily television ratings derived from people-meters (Eastman and Ferguson, 2012; Koch-Gombert, 2010; Webster et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more they seek ritualistic gratifications, the more they feel attached to a medium itself than to any particular content delivered by it (e.g. Rosenstein and Grant, 1997; Lometti and Addington, 1992; Webster et al , 2006; Webster and Wakshlag, 1983). Consistent with the argument, ritualistic television viewers watch television to relax, kill time, reinforce viewing habits, or feel secure with televisions on in the background (Rubin, 1984, 1993; Papacharissi and Mendelson, 2007; Rubin and Step, 1997).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to lack of information or indifference, audiences may stay tuned to programmes that do not reflect their tastes as they might perceive them on other occasions, for instance, during a polling interview. 54 This interpretation is backed by the fact that postmodern audiences with multiple channel options are easily overwhelmed by the number of choices and tend to use television as a stopgap between other more pressing or meaningful activities. 55 In my assessment, this interpretation does not apply to German viewers in the era of public television.…”
Section: Graph 3 Average Ratings Of Zdf Programmes On Nazism By Topic In Comparison Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially considering their limited options, the programmes watched by the viewers of public television are more accurately described as the least objectionable programmes they could find at any given point in time. 58 Therefore, we should not assume that the programmes precisely delineate the historical pain threshold of the audience. The programmes reflect their makers' informed assessment of public opinion, but in the high-stakes game of television, TV journalists were not likely to test the limits of historical taste.…”
Section: Graph 3 Average Ratings Of Zdf Programmes On Nazism By Topic In Comparison Tomentioning
confidence: 99%