Rash Model Analysis of Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) to Indonesian Students

Susanto, Eko; Novitasari, Yuni; Ahman,; Nurhudaya,; Rakhmat, Cece; Hidayat, Ade; Wibowo, Satrio

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012027

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This study collated data on the K-DOCS from numerous past and ongoing studies with American participants to meet three key objectives: (a) to confirm the factor structure of the K-DOCS; (b) to determine the equivalence of this structure across gender; and (c) to provide norms for the K-DOCS subscales to inform future research (or in-class demonstrations). Although earlier research has investigated the scale's underlying structure, even across its translations (Awofala & Fatade, 2015;Faletič & Avsec, 2019;Susanto et al, 2018;Tan et al, 2016), the number of observations in the present dataset was the largest to date. The size of the sample permitted a thorough analysis of the K-DOCS and assisted in establishing norms for the instrument.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Norming the Muses: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Kapoor

Reiter‐Palmon

Kaufman

2021

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS; Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308. doi:10.1037/a0029751) is a self-report assessment of five creative domains: Everyday, Scholarly, Performance, Scientific, and Artistic. This investigation was designed to reassess the factor structure of the K-DOCS, examine its measurement invariance across men and women, and develop norms across the five domains. Data on 22,013 American participants who had completed the assessment as part of past or ongoing studies between 2012 and 2020 were collated across multiple samples. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that both five- and nine-factor solutions had superior fit compared to a one-factor solution. The models were also gender invariant, indicating that creative domains were assessed similarly across male and female samples. Norms across gender and age-groups were provided to enable future comparisons in research settings; it is not recommended to use these norms in clinical or diagnostic contexts. The investigation concluded that the K-DOCS is a robust psychometric tool for the self-assessment of creativity across domains.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Norming the Muses: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Kapoor

Reiter‐Palmon

Kaufman

2021

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Susanto et al. (2018) administered 54 items, and this study was excluded. Another study (Aznar et al., 2021) was excluded because the parents filled out the K‐DOCS for their children.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five studies (Ashraf et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2022;Dousay & Weible, 2019;Jung et al, 2021;Magnusson, 2018) were removed from the analyses due to item number-note that the researchers used neither the full version nor the short versions and did not focus on any subscales in these studies. Susanto et al (2018) administered 54 items, and this study was excluded. Another study (Aznar et al, 2021) was excluded because the parents filled out the K-DOCS for their children.…”

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Reliability Generalization Meta‐Analysis of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Sen,

Yörük

2023

Journal of Creative Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K‐DOCS) is a self‐reported rating scale that measures creative behaviors in five areas. Despite the vast amount of research on the scale, the internal consistency reliability of K‐DOCS scores have not been examined. Specifically, there is no study on the overall reliability coefficients, the variation in the reliability of scores, and reliability induction. In the present study, reliability generalization meta‐analyses were conducted to address these issues. The sample consisted of 56 studies that produced 60 Cronbach's alpha coefficients in total. The pooled alpha values were estimated to be .904 (total scale), .825 (Self/Everyday subscale), .858 (Scholarly subscale), .887 (Performance subscale), .867 (Scientific subscale), and .861 (Artistic subscale). The moderator analyses showed that the reliability estimates of K‐DOCS total scores and Self/Everyday subscale scores did not differ with respect to any of the moderator variables. On the other hand, certain variables affected the alpha coefficients for Scholarly (educational level, SD of the age, and mean age), Performance (continent, educational level, ethnicity, Caucasian percentage, SD of the age, and mean age), Scientific (language, test version, continent, country, ethnicity, SD of the age, and mean age), and Artistic (continent, language, country, mean age, and total mean score) subscale scores. Finally, the reliability induction rate was 39.62%, and there were no statistically significant differences between the inducing and reporting studies with respect to the continuous variables (mean of the total score, means and SDs of the sample age, and percentages of female and Caucasian). Our findings indicate that the K‐DOCS provides highly reliable scores. However, certain variables contribute to systematic errors in Scholarly, Performance, Scientific, and Artistic subscale scores. Hence, scores on these subscales should be interpreted with caution. Due to a high amount of variation in the reliability coefficients, reliability induction is not advised for the K‐DOCS.

show abstract

“…Em relação à caracterização dos domínios, de acordo com Kaufman (2012) (Beaujean, 2014). O instrumento também apresenta valores de alpha de Cronbach entre 0,80 e 0,92 para cada domínio e já foi adaptado e tem apresentado boas evidências de validade também para outros países, como Turquia e Indonésia (Carson et al, 2005;Susanto et al, 2018;Kaufman, Waterstreet, Ailabouni, & Whitcomb, 2009;McKay, et al, 2016;Sahin, 2016 Jaussi et al, 2007;Silvia et al, 2009). Segundo Acar e Runco Portanto, é possível afirmar que tais achados apontam, não apenas para a relevância do processo de avaliação da criatividade por meio do modelo Big C, little c, uma vez que esse possibilita a investigação de diferentes formas de expressão criativa em situações cotidianas (Nakano & Wechsler, 2012).…”

unclassified

Adaptação e evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna da Escala de Domínios de Criatividade

Lessa

Campos

Oliveira

et al. 2020

Psico

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Escala de Domínios de Criatividade (K-DOCS) é amplamente utilizada internacionalmente, embora não haja estudos psicométricos nacionais. O presente estudo teve como objetivo adaptar e investigar as evidências de validade baseada na estrutura interna e na relação com variáveis externas, utilizando-se o Inventário dos Cinco Fatores (BFI-I). Colaboraram com a pesquisa 154 participantes, sendo 55% mulheres, com idades entre 18 e 58 (M=28,2; DP=9,41). A análise fatorial exploratória confirmou cinco fatores (acadêmico, performático, científico, artístico e cotidiano) e não foram excluídos itens da versão original. Observou-se convergência fatorial superior a 0,80, indicando bom ajuste fatorial dos itens. Quanto a relação com variáveis externas, foram encontradas correlações de magnitudes moderadas e fortes entre o K-DOCS e o BFI-I, apenas o fator científico não apresentou correlações significativas com os domínios do BFI-I. Conclui-se que os resultados encontrados sugerem a adequação do instrumento e que, novos estudos com o instrumentos se fazem pertinentes.

show abstract

Rash Model Analysis of Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) to Indonesian Students

Cited by 5 publications

References 15 publications

Norming the Muses: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Norming the Muses: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

A Reliability Generalization Meta‐Analysis of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Adaptação e evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna da Escala de Domínios de Criatividade

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About