1992
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90351-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare earth, major, and trace element composition of Monterey and DSDP chert and associated host sediment: Assessing the influence of chemical fractionation during diagenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical analyses indicate that sample YN1 from the ophiolitic mélange belongs to the pure siliceous rock of Murray et al [27] , 94.12% of SiO 2 with very few terrigenous mud (Table 1). However, four chert samples from the Pomulong mélange (J 3 K 1 P M ) and four other chert samples from the Zombe mélange (T 2-3 Z M ) contain less SiO 2 and more terrigenous mud than that of the sample YN1, which are consistent with their geological occurrence.…”
Section: Major Elementmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical analyses indicate that sample YN1 from the ophiolitic mélange belongs to the pure siliceous rock of Murray et al [27] , 94.12% of SiO 2 with very few terrigenous mud (Table 1). However, four chert samples from the Pomulong mélange (J 3 K 1 P M ) and four other chert samples from the Zombe mélange (T 2-3 Z M ) contain less SiO 2 and more terrigenous mud than that of the sample YN1, which are consistent with their geological occurrence.…”
Section: Major Elementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Ce/Ce* ratio is 0.3±0.13 for the siliceous sediments from the oceanic ridge basin, 0.60±0.13 for the sediments in oceanic basin, and 1.09±0.25 for those in continental margin basin. The ranges of La N /Ce N ratios for sedimentary chert from oceanic ridge, oceanic and continental margin basin are 3.5, 1.0-2.5, and 0.5-1.5 respectively [27,33,35] . Table 1 Major elements (%) and rare earth elements (10 −6 ) in the cherts from the Yarlung Zangbo suture zone a) The silicalites are analyzed by ICP-MS and international standards for rare earth elements and by X-fluorescence spectrum for major elements in Hubei Institute of Geological Experiment.…”
Section: Reementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compensate this dilution effect, normalization of constituent elements by Al or Ti have often been used (e.g., Murray et al, 1992a;Murray, 1994;Sugisaki et al, 1982;Yamamoto, 1983), based on that Al and Ti are incorporated mostly in lithogenic fraction and are not mobile during diagenesis. By using element/TiO 2 or element/Al 2 O 3 ratios, therefore, we could compare degree of elemental enrichment between bedded cherts and nonsiliceous marine sediments.…”
Section: Comparison Of Raw Data Of Cherts and Shales And Its Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that Wakamarina Quartzite was not a chert, where the high silica content is diagenetically derived from the host sediments (Murray et al 1992b). Comparative correlation coefficients (r) between the chemical compositions of DSDP and ODP cherts and Wakamarina Quartzite are sufficiently different to support a dominantly terrigenous detrital origin, with some hydrogenous precipitation, for Wakamarina Quartzite.…”
Section: The δmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the standard deviations of the three chert average analyses are generally large, such that direct comparison is equivocal. Murray et al (1992b) demonstrated that DSDP and nearshore cherts had Si/Al ratios far higher than their enclosing host sediments, reflecting the addition of SiO2 during diagenetic differentiation of the chert. Si/Al values for DSDP and ODP cherts representing pelagic to continental margin deposition (Murray et al 1992a) are (n = 36) mean 86 ± 83, range 6-273, median 46, whereas values for nearshore chert are (n = 9) mean 939 ± 1405, range 85 to >4400, median 181.…”
Section: Wakamarina Quartzitementioning
confidence: 99%