1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1986.tb00378.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare Earth Element Distribution Patterns in Shetland Steatite ‐ Consequences for Artifact Provenancing Studies

Abstract: An attempt has been made to relate steatite artifacts to the source of rock from which they were manufactured, using the distribution patterns of rare earth elements. Radiochemical‐ and instrumental‐neutron activation analyses of Shetland steatites suggest that the use of rare earth elements in artifact provenancing may be unreliable. Concentrations of rare earth elements in many Shetland steatites are too low to be measured reliably by a cost effective method. The relative importance of primary igneous and se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the data presented here suggest that there may have been some artefacts due to pre-concentration steps adopted by Bray, potentially due to variable recovery yields, or perhaps (as suggested by Bray (1994)) to blank levels associated with the exchange process. Nonetheless, both sets of ICP-MS-REE determinations show strongly source-specific patterns, which contrast favourably with the earlier INAA data from Moffat and Buttler (1986).…”
Section: Becker 17contrasting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the data presented here suggest that there may have been some artefacts due to pre-concentration steps adopted by Bray, potentially due to variable recovery yields, or perhaps (as suggested by Bray (1994)) to blank levels associated with the exchange process. Nonetheless, both sets of ICP-MS-REE determinations show strongly source-specific patterns, which contrast favourably with the earlier INAA data from Moffat and Buttler (1986).…”
Section: Becker 17contrasting
confidence: 75%
“…At Cunningsburgh (Fig. 3), the element concentration ranges (Table 4a) are low and vary considerably, as Moffat and Buttler (1986) found. However, Moffat and Buttler's determinations of Sm, Eu, Gd and Tb, for four of their samples from Cunningsburgh and Catpund Burn appear significantly over-estimated by comparison with samples in the present data set from similar localities (Fig.…”
Section: Chemical Datamentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations