2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Flame Synthesis of Atomically Thin MoO3 down to Monolayer Thickness for Effective Hole Doping of WSe2

Abstract: Two-dimensional (2D) molybdenum trioxide (MoO) with mono- or few-layer thickness can potentially advance many applications, ranging from optoelectronics, catalysis, sensors, and batteries to electrochromic devices. Such ultrathin MoO sheets can also be integrated with other 2D materials (e.g., as dopants) to realize new or improved electronic devices. However, there is lack of a rapid and scalable method to controllably grow mono- or few-layer MoO. Here, we report the first demonstration of using a rapid (<2 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been extensively investigated in devices with metal–MoS 2 contacts, but seems to be potentially less pronounced in other TMDs—because the forming energy of chalcogen vacancies (e.g., S, Se) in other TMDs (i.e., MoSe 2 , WS 2 ) is larger than that of sulfur vacancies in MoS 2 , which may reduce the number of vacancies in such TMDs compared to MoS 2 . Doping the metal/channel interface with substoichiometric oxides (MoO x , TiO x , and AlO x ) and/or NO 2 can efficiently lower the Schottky barrier, due to the suppression of Fermi level pinning at the interface of 2D materials and metal electrodes. Another option is to insert a buffer layer between the metal and the 2D channel, such as graphene or a thin insulating dielectric layer (such as 2 nm MgO, 1 nm TiO 2 , or 1–2 layer 2D insulating h‐BN), to form a tunneling buffer layer resulting in a metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) structure, which has shown a remarkable reduction of the Schottky barrier with small tunneling resistance.…”
Section: Effect Of the Electrode/channel Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect has been extensively investigated in devices with metal–MoS 2 contacts, but seems to be potentially less pronounced in other TMDs—because the forming energy of chalcogen vacancies (e.g., S, Se) in other TMDs (i.e., MoSe 2 , WS 2 ) is larger than that of sulfur vacancies in MoS 2 , which may reduce the number of vacancies in such TMDs compared to MoS 2 . Doping the metal/channel interface with substoichiometric oxides (MoO x , TiO x , and AlO x ) and/or NO 2 can efficiently lower the Schottky barrier, due to the suppression of Fermi level pinning at the interface of 2D materials and metal electrodes. Another option is to insert a buffer layer between the metal and the 2D channel, such as graphene or a thin insulating dielectric layer (such as 2 nm MgO, 1 nm TiO 2 , or 1–2 layer 2D insulating h‐BN), to form a tunneling buffer layer resulting in a metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) structure, which has shown a remarkable reduction of the Schottky barrier with small tunneling resistance.…”
Section: Effect Of the Electrode/channel Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this interfacial engineering perpetuates a long-standing flaw in high-κ integration on silicon, wherein several angstroms of native SiO x are grown as a buffer, deteriorating the series capacitance of the combined dielectric gate stack ( 4 , 5 ). In addition, for Mo- and W-based dichalcogenides, this approach is nonideal because MoO 3 and WO 3 , respectively, are not good insulators and may even act as dopants ( 15 , 17 , 18 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO x leaves and MoO x moves, forming pits on MoS 2 monolayers. MoO x is difficult to observe in TEM due to its sensitivity to the electron beam [32] but the formation of MoO x was confirmed by SEM, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and XPS analysis of ex situ thermal oxidation of MoS 2 monolayers ( Figure S14, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Forming Pits On Molybdenum Disulfide (Mos 2 ) Monolayers Is mentioning
confidence: 99%