2020
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202003020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Adventitious Carbon on Pit Formation of Monolayer MoS2

Abstract: Forming pits on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) monolayers is desirable for (opto)electrical, catalytic, and biological applications. Thermal oxidation is a potentially scalable method to generate pits on monolayer MoS2, and pits are assumed to preferentially form around undercoordinated sites, such as sulfur vacancies. However, studies on thermal oxidation of MoS2 monolayers have not considered the effect of adventitious carbon (C) that is ubiquitous and interacts with oxygen at elevated temperatures. Herein, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been already observed that adventitious carbon cannot be avoided for the MoS 2 samples handled and manipulated in air. [ 53 ] To illustrate the carbon interferences further, the S/Mo ratio drops to 1.2 on the oxidized portion of the flake, where indeed substantial amount of the MoO x is present, but at the same time adventitious carbon content is ≈65%. An expected S/Mo ratio is 2, but since Auger technique is particularly sensitive for lighter elements, such a heavy carbon content effectively masks the presence of the MoS 2 surface buried underneath the MoO x layer and the carbon layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been already observed that adventitious carbon cannot be avoided for the MoS 2 samples handled and manipulated in air. [ 53 ] To illustrate the carbon interferences further, the S/Mo ratio drops to 1.2 on the oxidized portion of the flake, where indeed substantial amount of the MoO x is present, but at the same time adventitious carbon content is ≈65%. An expected S/Mo ratio is 2, but since Auger technique is particularly sensitive for lighter elements, such a heavy carbon content effectively masks the presence of the MoS 2 surface buried underneath the MoO x layer and the carbon layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies on the thermal oxidation of MoS 2 reported that the oxidation process is fast when the temperature is above ≈250 °C (e.g., 250 °C in the air for 1 h, [ 12 ] 360 °C in the air for 5 min, [ 13 ] and 380 °C in the air for 10 min; Table S1, Supporting Information). [ 10 ] These findings were supported by ex situ observations of pits and crack formation, and identification of molybdenum oxides via atomic force microscopy (AFM), [ 12–16 ] scanning electron microscopy (SEM), [ 13,15,17 ] transmission electron microscopy (TEM), [ 17 ] X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), [ 12,16,17 ] nanomechanical means, [ 16 ] and Raman spectroscopy. [ 14 ] Such ex situ characterization methods, although very informative, may not detect subtle morphological and chemical compositional changes brought on by MoS 2 oxidation.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Forming pits on MoS 2 monolayers has been found to be desirable for promoting HER performance. Park et al 170 investigated the effect of adventitious C on the pit formation in the MoS 2 layers. They used an aperture type in situ ETEM to study the reaction between MoS 2 monolayers and O 2 .…”
Section: Main Strategies To Promote the Her Performance Of Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%